x86: Rename trap_no to trap_nr in thread_struct

There are precedences of trap number being referred to as
trap_nr. However thread struct refers trap number as trap_no.
Change it to trap_nr.

Also use enum instead of left-over literals for trap values.

This is pure cleanup, no functional change intended.

Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@eltu.hu>
Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Jim Keniston <jkenisto@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120312092555.5379.942.sendpatchset@srdronam.in.ibm.com
[ Fixed the math-emu build ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
Srikar Dronamraju
2012-03-12 14:55:55 +05:30
committed by Ingo Molnar
parent e898c67068
commit 51e7dc7011
10 changed files with 24 additions and 22 deletions

View File

@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ do_trap(int trapnr, int signr, char *str, struct pt_regs *regs,
trap_signal:
#endif
/*
* We want error_code and trap_no set for userspace faults and
* We want error_code and trap_nr set for userspace faults and
* kernelspace faults which result in die(), but not
* kernelspace faults which are fixed up. die() gives the
* process no chance to handle the signal and notice the
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ trap_signal:
* delivered, faults. See also do_general_protection below.
*/
tsk->thread.error_code = error_code;
tsk->thread.trap_no = trapnr;
tsk->thread.trap_nr = trapnr;
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
if (show_unhandled_signals && unhandled_signal(tsk, signr) &&
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ trap_signal:
kernel_trap:
if (!fixup_exception(regs)) {
tsk->thread.error_code = error_code;
tsk->thread.trap_no = trapnr;
tsk->thread.trap_nr = trapnr;
die(str, regs, error_code);
}
return;
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ dotraplinkage void do_double_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
notify_die(DIE_TRAP, str, regs, error_code, X86_TRAP_DF, SIGSEGV);
tsk->thread.error_code = error_code;
tsk->thread.trap_no = X86_TRAP_DF;
tsk->thread.trap_nr = X86_TRAP_DF;
/*
* This is always a kernel trap and never fixable (and thus must
@@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ do_general_protection(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
goto gp_in_kernel;
tsk->thread.error_code = error_code;
tsk->thread.trap_no = X86_TRAP_GP;
tsk->thread.trap_nr = X86_TRAP_GP;
if (show_unhandled_signals && unhandled_signal(tsk, SIGSEGV) &&
printk_ratelimit()) {
@@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ gp_in_kernel:
return;
tsk->thread.error_code = error_code;
tsk->thread.trap_no = X86_TRAP_GP;
tsk->thread.trap_nr = X86_TRAP_GP;
if (notify_die(DIE_GPF, "general protection fault", regs, error_code,
X86_TRAP_GP, SIGSEGV) == NOTIFY_STOP)
return;
@@ -475,7 +475,7 @@ void math_error(struct pt_regs *regs, int error_code, int trapnr)
{
if (!fixup_exception(regs)) {
task->thread.error_code = error_code;
task->thread.trap_no = trapnr;
task->thread.trap_nr = trapnr;
die(str, regs, error_code);
}
return;
@@ -485,7 +485,7 @@ void math_error(struct pt_regs *regs, int error_code, int trapnr)
* Save the info for the exception handler and clear the error.
*/
save_init_fpu(task);
task->thread.trap_no = trapnr;
task->thread.trap_nr = trapnr;
task->thread.error_code = error_code;
info.si_signo = SIGFPE;
info.si_errno = 0;