clockevents: Make suspend/resume calls explicit
clockevents_notify() is a leftover from the early design of the clockevents facility. It's really not a notification mechanism, it's a multiplex call. We are way better off to have explicit calls instead of this monstrosity. Split out the suspend/resume() calls and invoke them directly from the call sites. No locking required at this point because these calls happen with interrupts disabled and a single cpu online. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> [ Rebased on top of 4.0-rc5. ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/713674030.jVm1qaHuPf@vostro.rjw.lan [ Rebased on top of latest timers/core. ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:

committed by
Ingo Molnar

parent
db6f672ef1
commit
4ffee521f3
@@ -670,15 +670,6 @@ int clockevents_notify(unsigned long reason, void *arg)
|
||||
tick_handover_do_timer(arg);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
case CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_SUSPEND:
|
||||
tick_suspend();
|
||||
tick_suspend_broadcast();
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
case CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_RESUME:
|
||||
tick_resume();
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
case CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_CPU_DEAD:
|
||||
tick_shutdown_broadcast_oneshot(arg);
|
||||
tick_shutdown_broadcast(arg);
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user