Move locks API users to locks_lock_inode_wait()
Instead of having users check for FL_POSIX or FL_FLOCK to call the correct locks API function, use the check within locks_lock_inode_wait(). This allows for some later cleanup. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
This commit is contained in:

committato da
Jeff Layton

parent
e55c34a66f
commit
4f6563677a
@@ -738,18 +738,7 @@ out_noconflict:
|
||||
|
||||
static int do_vfs_lock(struct file *file, struct file_lock *fl)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int res = 0;
|
||||
switch (fl->fl_flags & (FL_POSIX|FL_FLOCK)) {
|
||||
case FL_POSIX:
|
||||
res = posix_lock_file_wait(file, fl);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case FL_FLOCK:
|
||||
res = flock_lock_file_wait(file, fl);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
default:
|
||||
BUG();
|
||||
}
|
||||
return res;
|
||||
return locks_lock_file_wait(file, fl);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int
|
||||
|
@@ -5472,18 +5472,7 @@ static int nfs4_proc_getlk(struct nfs4_state *state, int cmd, struct file_lock *
|
||||
|
||||
static int do_vfs_lock(struct inode *inode, struct file_lock *fl)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int res = 0;
|
||||
switch (fl->fl_flags & (FL_POSIX|FL_FLOCK)) {
|
||||
case FL_POSIX:
|
||||
res = posix_lock_inode_wait(inode, fl);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case FL_FLOCK:
|
||||
res = flock_lock_inode_wait(inode, fl);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
default:
|
||||
BUG();
|
||||
}
|
||||
return res;
|
||||
return locks_lock_inode_wait(inode, fl);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
struct nfs4_unlockdata {
|
||||
|
Fai riferimento in un nuovo problema
Block a user