xiaomi-sm8450/android_kernel_xiaomi_sm8450
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

xfrm: policy: match with both mark and mask on user interfaces

Browse Source 
In commit ed17b8d377 ("xfrm: fix a warning in xfrm_policy_insert_list"),
it would take 'priority' to make a policy unique, and allow duplicated
policies with different 'priority' to be added, which is not expected
by userland, as Tobias reported in strongswan.

To fix this duplicated policies issue, and also fix the issue in
commit ed17b8d377 ("xfrm: fix a warning in xfrm_policy_insert_list"),
when doing add/del/get/update on user interfaces, this patch is to change
to look up a policy with both mark and mask by doing:

  mark.v == pol->mark.v && mark.m == pol->mark.m

and leave the check:

  (mark & pol->mark.m) == pol->mark.v

for tx/rx path only.

As the userland expects an exact mark and mask match to manage policies.

v1->v2:
  - make xfrm_policy_mark_match inline and fix the changelog as
    Tobias suggested.

Fixes: 295fae5688 ("xfrm: Allow user space manipulation of SPD mark")
Fixes: ed17b8d377 ("xfrm: fix a warning in xfrm_policy_insert_list")
Reported-by: Tobias Brunner <tobias@strongswan.org>
Tested-by: Tobias Brunner <tobias@strongswan.org>
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
This commit is contained in:
Xin Long
2020-06-22 16:40:29 +08:00
committed by Steffen Klassert
parent 0275875530
commit 4f47e8ab6a
4 changed files with 36 additions and 36 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
net/key/af_key.c
View File

@@ -2400,7 +2400,7 @@ static int pfkey_spddelete(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, const struct sa
return err;
}
xp = xfrm_policy_bysel_ctx(net, DUMMY_MARK, 0, XFRM_POLICY_TYPE_MAIN,
xp = xfrm_policy_bysel_ctx(net, &dummy_mark, 0, XFRM_POLICY_TYPE_MAIN,
pol->sadb_x_policy_dir - 1, &sel, pol_ctx,
1, &err);
security_xfrm_policy_free(pol_ctx);
@@ -2651,7 +2651,7 @@ static int pfkey_spdget(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, const struct sadb_
return -EINVAL;
delete = (hdr->sadb_msg_type == SADB_X_SPDDELETE2);
xp = xfrm_policy_byid(net, DUMMY_MARK, 0, XFRM_POLICY_TYPE_MAIN,
xp = xfrm_policy_byid(net, &dummy_mark, 0, XFRM_POLICY_TYPE_MAIN,
dir, pol->sadb_x_policy_id, delete, &err);
if (xp == NULL)
return -ENOENT;