virtio_net: move tx vq operation under tx queue lock
[ Upstream commit 5a2f966d0f3fa0ef6dada7ab9eda74cacee96b8a ]
It's unsafe to operate a vq from multiple threads.
Unfortunately this is exactly what we do when invoking
clean tx poll from rx napi.
Same happens with napi-tx even without the
opportunistic cleaning from the receive interrupt: that races
with processing the vq in start_xmit.
As a fix move everything that deals with the vq to under tx lock.
Fixes: b92f1e6751
("virtio-net: transmit napi")
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:

committed by
Greg Kroah-Hartman

parent
8795692f0d
commit
4b3fd33f58
@@ -1519,6 +1519,8 @@ static int virtnet_poll_tx(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
|
|||||||
struct virtnet_info *vi = sq->vq->vdev->priv;
|
struct virtnet_info *vi = sq->vq->vdev->priv;
|
||||||
unsigned int index = vq2txq(sq->vq);
|
unsigned int index = vq2txq(sq->vq);
|
||||||
struct netdev_queue *txq;
|
struct netdev_queue *txq;
|
||||||
|
int opaque;
|
||||||
|
bool done;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (unlikely(is_xdp_raw_buffer_queue(vi, index))) {
|
if (unlikely(is_xdp_raw_buffer_queue(vi, index))) {
|
||||||
/* We don't need to enable cb for XDP */
|
/* We don't need to enable cb for XDP */
|
||||||
@@ -1528,10 +1530,28 @@ static int virtnet_poll_tx(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(vi->dev, index);
|
txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(vi->dev, index);
|
||||||
__netif_tx_lock(txq, raw_smp_processor_id());
|
__netif_tx_lock(txq, raw_smp_processor_id());
|
||||||
|
virtqueue_disable_cb(sq->vq);
|
||||||
free_old_xmit_skbs(sq, true);
|
free_old_xmit_skbs(sq, true);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
opaque = virtqueue_enable_cb_prepare(sq->vq);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
done = napi_complete_done(napi, 0);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
if (!done)
|
||||||
|
virtqueue_disable_cb(sq->vq);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
__netif_tx_unlock(txq);
|
__netif_tx_unlock(txq);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
virtqueue_napi_complete(napi, sq->vq, 0);
|
if (done) {
|
||||||
|
if (unlikely(virtqueue_poll(sq->vq, opaque))) {
|
||||||
|
if (napi_schedule_prep(napi)) {
|
||||||
|
__netif_tx_lock(txq, raw_smp_processor_id());
|
||||||
|
virtqueue_disable_cb(sq->vq);
|
||||||
|
__netif_tx_unlock(txq);
|
||||||
|
__napi_schedule(napi);
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (sq->vq->num_free >= 2 + MAX_SKB_FRAGS)
|
if (sq->vq->num_free >= 2 + MAX_SKB_FRAGS)
|
||||||
netif_tx_wake_queue(txq);
|
netif_tx_wake_queue(txq);
|
||||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user