ext4: use 'sbi' instead of 'EXT4_SB(sb)'
We could use 'sbi' instead of 'EXT4_SB(sb)' to make code more elegant. Signed-off-by: Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
This commit is contained in:

zatwierdzone przez
Theodore Ts'o

rodzic
06f29cc81f
commit
49598e04b5
@@ -757,10 +757,10 @@ void ext4_mb_generate_buddy(struct super_block *sb,
|
||||
clear_bit(EXT4_GROUP_INFO_NEED_INIT_BIT, &(grp->bb_state));
|
||||
|
||||
period = get_cycles() - period;
|
||||
spin_lock(&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_bal_lock);
|
||||
EXT4_SB(sb)->s_mb_buddies_generated++;
|
||||
EXT4_SB(sb)->s_mb_generation_time += period;
|
||||
spin_unlock(&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_bal_lock);
|
||||
spin_lock(&sbi->s_bal_lock);
|
||||
sbi->s_mb_buddies_generated++;
|
||||
sbi->s_mb_generation_time += period;
|
||||
spin_unlock(&sbi->s_bal_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void mb_regenerate_buddy(struct ext4_buddy *e4b)
|
||||
@@ -1447,7 +1447,7 @@ static void mb_free_blocks(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_buddy *e4b,
|
||||
ext4_fsblk_t blocknr;
|
||||
|
||||
blocknr = ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, e4b->bd_group);
|
||||
blocknr += EXT4_C2B(EXT4_SB(sb), block);
|
||||
blocknr += EXT4_C2B(sbi, block);
|
||||
ext4_grp_locked_error(sb, e4b->bd_group,
|
||||
inode ? inode->i_ino : 0,
|
||||
blocknr,
|
||||
@@ -4838,9 +4838,9 @@ do_more:
|
||||
if (in_range(ext4_block_bitmap(sb, gdp), block, count) ||
|
||||
in_range(ext4_inode_bitmap(sb, gdp), block, count) ||
|
||||
in_range(block, ext4_inode_table(sb, gdp),
|
||||
EXT4_SB(sb)->s_itb_per_group) ||
|
||||
sbi->s_itb_per_group) ||
|
||||
in_range(block + count - 1, ext4_inode_table(sb, gdp),
|
||||
EXT4_SB(sb)->s_itb_per_group)) {
|
||||
sbi->s_itb_per_group)) {
|
||||
|
||||
ext4_error(sb, "Freeing blocks in system zone - "
|
||||
"Block = %llu, count = %lu", block, count);
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user