[ARM] 4434/1: PXA: remove PXA_IRQ_SKIP
1. PXA_IRQ_SKIP is defined to be 7 on PXA25x so that the first IRQ starts from zero. This makes IRQ numbering inconsistent between PXA25x and PXA27x. Remove this macro so that the same IRQ_XXXXX definition has the same value on both PXA25x and PXA27x. 2. make IRQ_SSP3..IRQ_PWRI2C valid only if PXA27x is defined, this avoids unintentional use of these macros on PXA25x Signed-off-by: eric miao <eric.miao@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -30,12 +30,12 @@
|
||||
|
||||
static void pxa_mask_low_irq(unsigned int irq)
|
||||
{
|
||||
ICMR &= ~(1 << (irq + PXA_IRQ_SKIP));
|
||||
ICMR &= ~(1 << irq);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void pxa_unmask_low_irq(unsigned int irq)
|
||||
{
|
||||
ICMR |= (1 << (irq + PXA_IRQ_SKIP));
|
||||
ICMR |= (1 << irq);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int pxa_set_wake(unsigned int irq, unsigned int on)
|
||||
@@ -75,12 +75,12 @@ static struct irq_chip pxa_internal_chip_low = {
|
||||
|
||||
static void pxa_mask_high_irq(unsigned int irq)
|
||||
{
|
||||
ICMR2 &= ~(1 << (irq - 32 + PXA_IRQ_SKIP));
|
||||
ICMR2 &= ~(1 << (irq - 32));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void pxa_unmask_high_irq(unsigned int irq)
|
||||
{
|
||||
ICMR2 |= (1 << (irq - 32 + PXA_IRQ_SKIP));
|
||||
ICMR2 |= (1 << (irq - 32));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static struct irq_chip pxa_internal_chip_high = {
|
||||
@@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ void __init pxa_init_irq(void)
|
||||
/* GPIO 0 and 1 must have their mask bit always set */
|
||||
GPIO_IRQ_mask[0] = 3;
|
||||
|
||||
for (irq = PXA_IRQ(PXA_IRQ_SKIP); irq <= PXA_IRQ(31); irq++) {
|
||||
for (irq = PXA_IRQ(0); irq <= PXA_IRQ(31); irq++) {
|
||||
set_irq_chip(irq, &pxa_internal_chip_low);
|
||||
set_irq_handler(irq, handle_level_irq);
|
||||
set_irq_flags(irq, IRQF_VALID);
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user