mm: make get_user_pages() interruptible
The initial implementation of checking TIF_MEMDIE covers the cases of OOM killing. If the process has been OOM killed, the TIF_MEMDIE is set and it return immediately. This patch includes: 1. add the case that the SIGKILL is sent by user processes. The process can try to get_user_pages() unlimited memory even if a user process has sent a SIGKILL to it(maybe a monitor find the process exceed its memory limit and try to kill it). In the old implementation, the SIGKILL won't be handled until the get_user_pages() returns. 2. change the return value to be ERESTARTSYS. It makes no sense to return ENOMEM if the get_user_pages returned by getting a SIGKILL signal. Considering the general convention for a system call interrupted by a signal is ERESTARTNOSYS, so the current return value is consistant to that. Lee: An unfortunate side effect of "make-get_user_pages-interruptible" is that it prevents a SIGKILL'd task from munlock-ing pages that it had mlocked, resulting in freeing of mlocked pages. Freeing of mlocked pages, in itself, is not so bad. We just count them now--altho' I had hoped to remove this stat and add PG_MLOCKED to the free pages flags check. However, consider pages in shared libraries mapped by more than one task that a task mlocked--e.g., via mlockall(). If the task that mlocked the pages exits via SIGKILL, these pages would be left mlocked and unevictable. Proposed fix: Add another GUP flag to ignore sigkill when calling get_user_pages from munlock()--similar to Kosaki Motohiro's 'IGNORE_VMA_PERMISSIONS flag for the same purpose. We are not actually allocating memory in this case, which "make-get_user_pages-interruptible" intends to avoid. We're just munlocking pages that are already resident and mapped, and we're reusing get_user_pages() to access those pages. ?? Maybe we should combine 'IGNORE_VMA_PERMISSIONS and '_IGNORE_SIGKILL into a single flag: GUP_FLAGS_MUNLOCK ??? [Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com: ignore sigkill in get_user_pages during munlock] Signed-off-by: Paul Menage <menage@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com> Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru> Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com> Cc: Rohit Seth <rohitseth@google.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
14
mm/memory.c
14
mm/memory.c
@@ -1210,6 +1210,7 @@ int __get_user_pages(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
|
||||
int write = !!(flags & GUP_FLAGS_WRITE);
|
||||
int force = !!(flags & GUP_FLAGS_FORCE);
|
||||
int ignore = !!(flags & GUP_FLAGS_IGNORE_VMA_PERMISSIONS);
|
||||
int ignore_sigkill = !!(flags & GUP_FLAGS_IGNORE_SIGKILL);
|
||||
|
||||
if (len <= 0)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
@@ -1288,12 +1289,15 @@ int __get_user_pages(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
|
||||
struct page *page;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If tsk is ooming, cut off its access to large memory
|
||||
* allocations. It has a pending SIGKILL, but it can't
|
||||
* be processed until returning to user space.
|
||||
* If we have a pending SIGKILL, don't keep faulting
|
||||
* pages and potentially allocating memory, unless
|
||||
* current is handling munlock--e.g., on exit. In
|
||||
* that case, we are not allocating memory. Rather,
|
||||
* we're only unlocking already resident/mapped pages.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (unlikely(test_tsk_thread_flag(tsk, TIF_MEMDIE)))
|
||||
return i ? i : -ENOMEM;
|
||||
if (unlikely(!ignore_sigkill &&
|
||||
fatal_signal_pending(current)))
|
||||
return i ? i : -ERESTARTSYS;
|
||||
|
||||
if (write)
|
||||
foll_flags |= FOLL_WRITE;
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user