sh: fix seq_file memory leak

When using single_open(), single_release() should be used instead
of seq_release(), otherwise there is a memory leak.

Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
This commit is contained in:
Li Zefan
2008-06-24 13:30:23 +08:00
کامیت شده توسط Paul Mundt
والد c9272c4f9f
کامیت 45dabf1427
2فایلهای تغییر یافته به همراه2 افزوده شده و 2 حذف شده

مشاهده پرونده

@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ static const struct file_operations cache_debugfs_fops = {
.open = cache_debugfs_open,
.read = seq_read,
.llseek = seq_lseek,
.release = seq_release,
.release = single_release,
};
static int __init cache_debugfs_init(void)

مشاهده پرونده

@@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ static const struct file_operations pmb_debugfs_fops = {
.open = pmb_debugfs_open,
.read = seq_read,
.llseek = seq_lseek,
.release = seq_release,
.release = single_release,
};
static int __init pmb_debugfs_init(void)