xiaomi-sm8450/android_kernel_xiaomi_sm8450
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

block: Kill bio_segments()/bi_vcnt usage

Browse Source 
When we start sharing biovecs, keeping bi_vcnt accurate for splits is
going to be error prone - and unnecessary, if we refactor some code.

So bio_segments() has to go - but most of the existing users just needed
to know if the bio had multiple segments, which is easier - add a
bio_multiple_segments() for them.

(Two of the current uses of bio_segments() are going to go away in a
couple patches, but the current implementation of bio_segments() is
unsafe as soon as we start doing driver conversions for immutable
biovecs - so implement a dumb version for bisectability, it'll go away
in a couple patches)

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Nagalakshmi Nandigama <Nagalakshmi.Nandigama@lsi.com>
Cc: Sreekanth Reddy <Sreekanth.Reddy@lsi.com>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@parallels.com>
This commit is contained in:
Kent Overstreet
2013-09-24 16:26:05 -07:00
parent d57a5f7c66
commit 458b76ed2f
10 changed files with 93 additions and 86 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
View File

@@ -2163,10 +2163,10 @@ int sas_smp_handler(struct Scsi_Host *shost, struct sas_rphy *rphy,
}
/* do we need to support multiple segments? */
if (bio_segments(req->bio) > 1 || bio_segments(rsp->bio) > 1) {
printk("%s: multiple segments req %u %u, rsp %u %u\n",
__func__, bio_segments(req->bio), blk_rq_bytes(req),
bio_segments(rsp->bio), blk_rq_bytes(rsp));
if (bio_multiple_segments(req->bio) ||
bio_multiple_segments(rsp->bio)) {
printk("%s: multiple segments req %u, rsp %u\n",
__func__, blk_rq_bytes(req), blk_rq_bytes(rsp));
return -EINVAL;
}