ARM: net: support BPF_ALU | BPF_MOD instructions in the BPF JIT.

For ARMv7 with UDIV instruction support, generate an UDIV instruction
followed by an MLS instruction.

For other ARM variants, generate code calling a C wrapper similar to
the jit_udiv() function used for BPF_ALU | BPF_DIV instructions.

Some performance numbers reported by the test_bpf module (the duration
per filter run is reported in nanoseconds, between "jitted:<x>" and
"PASS":

ARMv7 QEMU nojit:	test_bpf: #3 DIV_MOD_KX jited:0 2196 PASS
ARMv7 QEMU jit:		test_bpf: #3 DIV_MOD_KX jited:1 104 PASS
ARMv5 QEMU nojit:	test_bpf: #3 DIV_MOD_KX jited:0 2176 PASS
ARMv5 QEMU jit:		test_bpf: #3 DIV_MOD_KX jited:1 1104 PASS
ARMv5 kirkwood nojit:	test_bpf: #3 DIV_MOD_KX jited:0 1103 PASS
ARMv5 kirkwood jit:	test_bpf: #3 DIV_MOD_KX jited:1 311 PASS

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Šī revīzija ir iekļauta:
Nicolas Schichan
2015-10-02 17:06:47 +02:00
revīziju iesūtīja David S. Miller
vecāks df7b601542
revīzija 4560cdff03
2 mainīti faili ar 37 papildinājumiem un 6 dzēšanām

Parādīt failu

@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static u64 jit_get_skb_w(struct sk_buff *skb, int offset)
}
/*
* Wrapper that handles both OABI and EABI and assures Thumb2 interworking
* Wrappers which handle both OABI and EABI and assures Thumb2 interworking
* (where the assembly routines like __aeabi_uidiv could cause problems).
*/
static u32 jit_udiv(u32 dividend, u32 divisor)
@@ -133,6 +133,11 @@ static u32 jit_udiv(u32 dividend, u32 divisor)
return dividend / divisor;
}
static u32 jit_mod(u32 dividend, u32 divisor)
{
return dividend % divisor;
}
static inline void _emit(int cond, u32 inst, struct jit_ctx *ctx)
{
inst |= (cond << 28);
@@ -471,11 +476,17 @@ static inline void emit_blx_r(u8 tgt_reg, struct jit_ctx *ctx)
#endif
}
static inline void emit_udiv(u8 rd, u8 rm, u8 rn, struct jit_ctx *ctx)
static inline void emit_udivmod(u8 rd, u8 rm, u8 rn, struct jit_ctx *ctx,
int bpf_op)
{
#if __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ == 7
if (elf_hwcap & HWCAP_IDIVA) {
emit(ARM_UDIV(rd, rm, rn), ctx);
if (bpf_op == BPF_DIV)
emit(ARM_UDIV(rd, rm, rn), ctx);
else {
emit(ARM_UDIV(ARM_R3, rm, rn), ctx);
emit(ARM_MLS(rd, rn, ARM_R3, rm), ctx);
}
return;
}
#endif
@@ -496,7 +507,8 @@ static inline void emit_udiv(u8 rd, u8 rm, u8 rn, struct jit_ctx *ctx)
emit(ARM_MOV_R(ARM_R0, rm), ctx);
ctx->seen |= SEEN_CALL;
emit_mov_i(ARM_R3, (u32)jit_udiv, ctx);
emit_mov_i(ARM_R3, bpf_op == BPF_DIV ? (u32)jit_udiv : (u32)jit_mod,
ctx);
emit_blx_r(ARM_R3, ctx);
if (rd != ARM_R0)
@@ -697,13 +709,27 @@ load_ind:
if (k == 1)
break;
emit_mov_i(r_scratch, k, ctx);
emit_udiv(r_A, r_A, r_scratch, ctx);
emit_udivmod(r_A, r_A, r_scratch, ctx, BPF_DIV);
break;
case BPF_ALU | BPF_DIV | BPF_X:
update_on_xread(ctx);
emit(ARM_CMP_I(r_X, 0), ctx);
emit_err_ret(ARM_COND_EQ, ctx);
emit_udiv(r_A, r_A, r_X, ctx);
emit_udivmod(r_A, r_A, r_X, ctx, BPF_DIV);
break;
case BPF_ALU | BPF_MOD | BPF_K:
if (k == 1) {
emit_mov_i(r_A, 0, ctx);
break;
}
emit_mov_i(r_scratch, k, ctx);
emit_udivmod(r_A, r_A, r_scratch, ctx, BPF_MOD);
break;
case BPF_ALU | BPF_MOD | BPF_X:
update_on_xread(ctx);
emit(ARM_CMP_I(r_X, 0), ctx);
emit_err_ret(ARM_COND_EQ, ctx);
emit_udivmod(r_A, r_A, r_X, ctx, BPF_MOD);
break;
case BPF_ALU | BPF_OR | BPF_K:
/* A |= K */