ACPI: call acpi_power_init() explicitly rather than as initcall
This patch makes acpi_init() call acpi_power_init() directly. Previously, both were subsys_initcalls. acpi_power_init() must happen after acpi_init(), and it's better to call it explicitly rather than rely on link ordering. Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> CC: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -773,14 +773,10 @@ static int acpi_power_resume(struct acpi_device *device)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int __init acpi_power_init(void)
|
||||
int __init acpi_power_init(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int result = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if (acpi_disabled)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&acpi_power_resource_list);
|
||||
|
||||
acpi_power_dir = proc_mkdir(ACPI_POWER_CLASS, acpi_root_dir);
|
||||
@@ -795,5 +791,3 @@ static int __init acpi_power_init(void)
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
subsys_initcall(acpi_power_init);
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user