Merge branch 'locking-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

Pull locking updates from Ingo Molnar:
 "The main changes in this cycle were:

   - Implement wraparound-safe refcount_t and kref_t types based on
     generic atomic primitives (Peter Zijlstra)

   - Improve and fix the ww_mutex code (Nicolai Hähnle)

   - Add self-tests to the ww_mutex code (Chris Wilson)

   - Optimize percpu-rwsems with the 'rcuwait' mechanism (Davidlohr
     Bueso)

   - Micro-optimize the current-task logic all around the core kernel
     (Davidlohr Bueso)

   - Tidy up after recent optimizations: remove stale code and APIs,
     clean up the code (Waiman Long)

   - ... plus misc fixes, updates and cleanups"

* 'locking-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (50 commits)
  fork: Fix task_struct alignment
  locking/spinlock/debug: Remove spinlock lockup detection code
  lockdep: Fix incorrect condition to print bug msgs for MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS
  lkdtm: Convert to refcount_t testing
  kref: Implement 'struct kref' using refcount_t
  refcount_t: Introduce a special purpose refcount type
  sched/wake_q: Clarify queue reinit comment
  sched/wait, rcuwait: Fix typo in comment
  locking/mutex: Fix lockdep_assert_held() fail
  locking/rtmutex: Flip unlikely() branch to likely() in __rt_mutex_slowlock()
  locking/rwsem: Reinit wake_q after use
  locking/rwsem: Remove unnecessary atomic_long_t casts
  jump_labels: Move header guard #endif down where it belongs
  locking/atomic, kref: Implement kref_put_lock()
  locking/ww_mutex: Turn off __must_check for now
  locking/atomic, kref: Avoid more abuse
  locking/atomic, kref: Use kref_get_unless_zero() more
  locking/atomic, kref: Kill kref_sub()
  locking/atomic, kref: Add kref_read()
  locking/atomic, kref: Add KREF_INIT()
  ...

include/linux/sched.h

@@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ extern void proc_sched_set_task(struct task_struct *p);
 extern char ___assert_task_state[1 - 2*!!(
 		sizeof(TASK_STATE_TO_CHAR_STR)-1 != ilog2(TASK_STATE_MAX)+1)];
 
-/* Convenience macros for the sake of set_task_state */
+/* Convenience macros for the sake of set_current_state */
 #define TASK_KILLABLE		(TASK_WAKEKILL | TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE)
 #define TASK_STOPPED		(TASK_WAKEKILL | __TASK_STOPPED)
 #define TASK_TRACED		(TASK_WAKEKILL | __TASK_TRACED)
@@ -253,17 +253,6 @@ extern char ___assert_task_state[1 - 2*!!(
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP
 
-#define __set_task_state(tsk, state_value)			\
-	do {							\
-		(tsk)->task_state_change = _THIS_IP_;		\
-		(tsk)->state = (state_value);			\
-	} while (0)
-#define set_task_state(tsk, state_value)			\
-	do {							\
-		(tsk)->task_state_change = _THIS_IP_;		\
-		smp_store_mb((tsk)->state, (state_value));	\
-	} while (0)
-
 #define __set_current_state(state_value)			\
 	do {							\
 		current->task_state_change = _THIS_IP_;		\
@@ -276,20 +265,6 @@ extern char ___assert_task_state[1 - 2*!!(
 	} while (0)
 
 #else
-
-/*
- * @tsk had better be current, or you get to keep the pieces.
- *
- * The only reason is that computing current can be more expensive than
- * using a pointer that's already available.
- *
- * Therefore, see set_current_state().
- */
-#define __set_task_state(tsk, state_value)		\
-	do { (tsk)->state = (state_value); } while (0)
-#define set_task_state(tsk, state_value)		\
-	smp_store_mb((tsk)->state, (state_value))
-
 /*
  * set_current_state() includes a barrier so that the write of current->state
  * is correctly serialised wrt the caller's subsequent test of whether to
@@ -1018,8 +993,8 @@ enum cpu_idle_type {
  *
  * The DEFINE_WAKE_Q macro declares and initializes the list head.
  * wake_up_q() does NOT reinitialize the list; it's expected to be
- * called near the end of a function, where the fact that the queue is
- * not used again will be easy to see by inspection.
+ * called near the end of a function. Otherwise, the list can be
+ * re-initialized for later re-use by wake_q_init().
  *
  * Note that this can cause spurious wakeups. schedule() callers
  * must ensure the call is done inside a loop, confirming that the
@@ -1039,6 +1014,12 @@ struct wake_q_head {
 #define DEFINE_WAKE_Q(name)				\
 	struct wake_q_head name = { WAKE_Q_TAIL, &name.first }
 
+static inline void wake_q_init(struct wake_q_head *head)
+{
+	head->first = WAKE_Q_TAIL;
+	head->lastp = &head->first;
+}
+
 extern void wake_q_add(struct wake_q_head *head,
 		       struct task_struct *task);
 extern void wake_up_q(struct wake_q_head *head);