nilfs2: cleanup multi kmem_cache_{create,destroy} code
This cleanup patch gives several improvements: - Moving all kmem_cache_{create_destroy} calls into one place, which removes some small function calls, cleans up error check code and clarify the logic. - Mark all initial code in __init section. - Remove some very obvious comments. - Adjust some declarations. - Fix some space-tab issues. Signed-off-by: Li Hong <lihong.hi@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -30,9 +30,6 @@
|
||||
#include "btnode.h"
|
||||
#include "bmap.h"
|
||||
|
||||
struct nilfs_btree;
|
||||
struct nilfs_btree_path;
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* struct nilfs_btree - B-tree structure
|
||||
* @bt_bmap: bmap base structure
|
||||
@@ -41,6 +38,25 @@ struct nilfs_btree {
|
||||
struct nilfs_bmap bt_bmap;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* struct nilfs_btree_path - A path on which B-tree operations are executed
|
||||
* @bp_bh: buffer head of node block
|
||||
* @bp_sib_bh: buffer head of sibling node block
|
||||
* @bp_index: index of child node
|
||||
* @bp_oldreq: ptr end request for old ptr
|
||||
* @bp_newreq: ptr alloc request for new ptr
|
||||
* @bp_op: rebalance operation
|
||||
*/
|
||||
struct nilfs_btree_path {
|
||||
struct buffer_head *bp_bh;
|
||||
struct buffer_head *bp_sib_bh;
|
||||
int bp_index;
|
||||
union nilfs_bmap_ptr_req bp_oldreq;
|
||||
union nilfs_bmap_ptr_req bp_newreq;
|
||||
struct nilfs_btnode_chkey_ctxt bp_ctxt;
|
||||
void (*bp_op)(struct nilfs_btree *, struct nilfs_btree_path *,
|
||||
int, __u64 *, __u64 *);
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
#define NILFS_BTREE_ROOT_SIZE NILFS_BMAP_SIZE
|
||||
#define NILFS_BTREE_ROOT_NCHILDREN_MAX \
|
||||
@@ -57,6 +73,7 @@ struct nilfs_btree {
|
||||
#define NILFS_BTREE_KEY_MIN ((__u64)0)
|
||||
#define NILFS_BTREE_KEY_MAX (~(__u64)0)
|
||||
|
||||
extern struct kmem_cache *nilfs_btree_path_cache;
|
||||
|
||||
int nilfs_btree_path_cache_init(void);
|
||||
void nilfs_btree_path_cache_destroy(void);
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user