xiaomi-sm8450/android_kernel_xiaomi_sm8450
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

powerpc/eeh: Remove unnecessary config_addr from eeh_dev

Browse Source 
The eeh_dev struct hold a config space address of an associated node
and the very same address is also stored in the pci_dn struct which
is always present during the eeh_dev lifetime.

This uses bus:devfn directly from pci_dn instead of cached and packed
config_addr.

Since config_addr is made from device's bus:dev.fn, there is no point
in keeping it in the debugfs either so remove that too.

Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
This commit is contained in:
Alexey Kardashevskiy
2017-08-29 17:34:02 +10:00
committed by Michael Ellerman
parent 69672bd748
commit 405b33a76d
5 changed files with 26 additions and 31 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

42
arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c
View File

@@ -340,11 +340,12 @@ int eeh_add_to_parent_pe(struct eeh_dev *edev)
{
struct eeh_pe *pe, *parent;
struct pci_dn *pdn = eeh_dev_to_pdn(edev);
int config_addr = (pdn->busno << 8) | (pdn->devfn);
/* Check if the PE number is valid */
if (!eeh_has_flag(EEH_VALID_PE_ZERO) && !edev->pe_config_addr) {
pr_err("%s: Invalid PE#0 for edev 0x%x on PHB#%x\n",
__func__, edev->config_addr, pdn->phb->global_number);
__func__, config_addr, pdn->phb->global_number);
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -354,8 +355,7 @@ int eeh_add_to_parent_pe(struct eeh_dev *edev)
* PE should be composed of PCI bus and its subordinate
* components.
*/
pe = eeh_pe_get(pdn->phb, edev->pe_config_addr,
edev->config_addr);
pe = eeh_pe_get(pdn->phb, edev->pe_config_addr, config_addr);
if (pe && !(pe->type & EEH_PE_INVALID)) {
/* Mark the PE as type of PCI bus */
pe->type = EEH_PE_BUS;
@@ -365,10 +365,10 @@ int eeh_add_to_parent_pe(struct eeh_dev *edev)
list_add_tail(&edev->list, &pe->edevs);
pr_debug("EEH: Add %04x:%02x:%02x.%01x to Bus PE#%x\n",
pdn->phb->global_number,
edev->config_addr >> 8,
PCI_SLOT(edev->config_addr & 0xFF),
PCI_FUNC(edev->config_addr & 0xFF),
pe->addr);
pdn->busno,
PCI_SLOT(pdn->devfn),
PCI_FUNC(pdn->devfn),
pe->addr);
return 0;
} else if (pe && (pe->type & EEH_PE_INVALID)) {
list_add_tail(&edev->list, &pe->edevs);
@@ -388,10 +388,10 @@ int eeh_add_to_parent_pe(struct eeh_dev *edev)
pr_debug("EEH: Add %04x:%02x:%02x.%01x to Device "
"PE#%x, Parent PE#%x\n",
pdn->phb->global_number,
edev->config_addr >> 8,
PCI_SLOT(edev->config_addr & 0xFF),
PCI_FUNC(edev->config_addr & 0xFF),
pe->addr, pe->parent->addr);
pdn->busno,
PCI_SLOT(pdn->devfn),
PCI_FUNC(pdn->devfn),
pe->addr, pe->parent->addr);
return 0;
}
@@ -405,7 +405,7 @@ int eeh_add_to_parent_pe(struct eeh_dev *edev)
return -ENOMEM;
}
pe->addr = edev->pe_config_addr;
pe->config_addr = edev->config_addr;
pe->config_addr = config_addr;
/*
* Put the new EEH PE into hierarchy tree. If the parent
@@ -436,9 +436,9 @@ int eeh_add_to_parent_pe(struct eeh_dev *edev)
pr_debug("EEH: Add %04x:%02x:%02x.%01x to "
"Device PE#%x, Parent PE#%x\n",
pdn->phb->global_number,
edev->config_addr >> 8,
PCI_SLOT(edev->config_addr & 0xFF),
PCI_FUNC(edev->config_addr & 0xFF),
pdn->busno,
PCI_SLOT(pdn->devfn),
PCI_FUNC(pdn->devfn),
pe->addr, pe->parent->addr);
return 0;
@@ -462,9 +462,9 @@ int eeh_rmv_from_parent_pe(struct eeh_dev *edev)
if (!edev->pe) {
pr_debug("%s: No PE found for device %04x:%02x:%02x.%01x\n",
__func__, pdn->phb->global_number,
edev->config_addr >> 8,
PCI_SLOT(edev->config_addr & 0xFF),
PCI_FUNC(edev->config_addr & 0xFF));
pdn->busno,
PCI_SLOT(pdn->devfn),
PCI_FUNC(pdn->devfn));
return -EEXIST;
}
@@ -725,9 +725,9 @@ static void eeh_bridge_check_link(struct eeh_dev *edev)
pr_debug("%s: Check PCIe link for %04x:%02x:%02x.%01x ...\n",
__func__, pdn->phb->global_number,
edev->config_addr >> 8,
PCI_SLOT(edev->config_addr & 0xFF),
PCI_FUNC(edev->config_addr & 0xFF));
pdn->busno,
PCI_SLOT(pdn->devfn),
PCI_FUNC(pdn->devfn));
/* Check slot status */
cap = edev->pcie_cap;