i2c: remove i2c_lock_adapter and use i2c_lock_bus directly

The i2c_lock_adapter name is ambiguous since it is unclear if it
refers to the root adapter or the adapter you name in the argument.
The natural interpretation is the adapter you name in the argument,
but there are historical reasons for that not being the case; it
in fact locks the root adapter. Just remove the function and force
users to spell out the I2C_LOCK_ROOT_ADAPTER name to indicate what
is really going on. Also remove i2c_unlock_adapter, of course.

This patch was generated with

git grep -l 'i2c_\(un\)\?lock_adapter' \
| xargs sed -i 's/i2c_\(un\)\?lock_adapter(\([^)]*\))/'\
'i2c_\1lock_bus(\2, I2C_LOCK_ROOT_ADAPTER)/g'

followed by white-space touch-up.

Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
This commit is contained in:
Peter Rosin
2018-06-20 07:18:03 +02:00
committed by Wolfram Sang
parent 8c8f74f327
commit 3f3a89e1d7
8 changed files with 38 additions and 50 deletions

View File

@@ -47,9 +47,9 @@ int i2c_slave_register(struct i2c_client *client, i2c_slave_cb_t slave_cb)
client->slave_cb = slave_cb;
i2c_lock_adapter(client->adapter);
i2c_lock_bus(client->adapter, I2C_LOCK_ROOT_ADAPTER);
ret = client->adapter->algo->reg_slave(client);
i2c_unlock_adapter(client->adapter);
i2c_unlock_bus(client->adapter, I2C_LOCK_ROOT_ADAPTER);
if (ret) {
client->slave_cb = NULL;
@@ -69,9 +69,9 @@ int i2c_slave_unregister(struct i2c_client *client)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
i2c_lock_adapter(client->adapter);
i2c_lock_bus(client->adapter, I2C_LOCK_ROOT_ADAPTER);
ret = client->adapter->algo->unreg_slave(client);
i2c_unlock_adapter(client->adapter);
i2c_unlock_bus(client->adapter, I2C_LOCK_ROOT_ADAPTER);
if (ret == 0)
client->slave_cb = NULL;