Btrfs: add btrfs_next_old_leaf
To make sense of the tree mod log, the backref walker not only needs btrfs_search_old_slot, but it also called btrfs_next_leaf, which in turn was calling btrfs_search_slot. This obviously didn't give the correct result. This commit adds btrfs_next_old_leaf, a drop-in replacement for btrfs_next_leaf with a time_seq parameter. If it is zero, it behaves exactly like btrfs_next_leaf. If it is non-zero, it will use btrfs_search_old_slot with this time_seq parameter. Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -5016,6 +5016,12 @@ next:
|
||||
* returns < 0 on io errors.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
int btrfs_next_leaf(struct btrfs_root *root, struct btrfs_path *path)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return btrfs_next_old_leaf(root, path, 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int btrfs_next_old_leaf(struct btrfs_root *root, struct btrfs_path *path,
|
||||
u64 time_seq)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int slot;
|
||||
int level;
|
||||
@@ -5041,7 +5047,10 @@ again:
|
||||
path->keep_locks = 1;
|
||||
path->leave_spinning = 1;
|
||||
|
||||
ret = btrfs_search_slot(NULL, root, &key, path, 0, 0);
|
||||
if (time_seq)
|
||||
ret = btrfs_search_old_slot(root, &key, path, time_seq);
|
||||
else
|
||||
ret = btrfs_search_slot(NULL, root, &key, path, 0, 0);
|
||||
path->keep_locks = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if (ret < 0)
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user