[PATCH] audit: rename AUDIT_SE_* constants
This patch renames some audit constant definitions and adds additional definitions used by the following patch. The renaming avoids ambiguity with respect to the new definitions. Signed-off-by: Darrel Goeddel <dgoeddel@trustedcs.com> include/linux/audit.h | 15 ++++++++---- kernel/auditfilter.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- kernel/auditsc.c | 10 ++++---- security/selinux/ss/services.c | 32 +++++++++++++------------- 4 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-) Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1845,15 +1845,15 @@ int selinux_audit_rule_init(u32 field, u32 op, char *rulestr,
|
||||
return -ENOTSUPP;
|
||||
|
||||
switch (field) {
|
||||
case AUDIT_SE_USER:
|
||||
case AUDIT_SE_ROLE:
|
||||
case AUDIT_SE_TYPE:
|
||||
case AUDIT_SUBJ_USER:
|
||||
case AUDIT_SUBJ_ROLE:
|
||||
case AUDIT_SUBJ_TYPE:
|
||||
/* only 'equals' and 'not equals' fit user, role, and type */
|
||||
if (op != AUDIT_EQUAL && op != AUDIT_NOT_EQUAL)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case AUDIT_SE_SEN:
|
||||
case AUDIT_SE_CLR:
|
||||
case AUDIT_SUBJ_SEN:
|
||||
case AUDIT_SUBJ_CLR:
|
||||
/* we do not allow a range, indicated by the presense of '-' */
|
||||
if (strchr(rulestr, '-'))
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
@@ -1874,29 +1874,29 @@ int selinux_audit_rule_init(u32 field, u32 op, char *rulestr,
|
||||
tmprule->au_seqno = latest_granting;
|
||||
|
||||
switch (field) {
|
||||
case AUDIT_SE_USER:
|
||||
case AUDIT_SUBJ_USER:
|
||||
userdatum = hashtab_search(policydb.p_users.table, rulestr);
|
||||
if (!userdatum)
|
||||
rc = -EINVAL;
|
||||
else
|
||||
tmprule->au_ctxt.user = userdatum->value;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case AUDIT_SE_ROLE:
|
||||
case AUDIT_SUBJ_ROLE:
|
||||
roledatum = hashtab_search(policydb.p_roles.table, rulestr);
|
||||
if (!roledatum)
|
||||
rc = -EINVAL;
|
||||
else
|
||||
tmprule->au_ctxt.role = roledatum->value;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case AUDIT_SE_TYPE:
|
||||
case AUDIT_SUBJ_TYPE:
|
||||
typedatum = hashtab_search(policydb.p_types.table, rulestr);
|
||||
if (!typedatum)
|
||||
rc = -EINVAL;
|
||||
else
|
||||
tmprule->au_ctxt.type = typedatum->value;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case AUDIT_SE_SEN:
|
||||
case AUDIT_SE_CLR:
|
||||
case AUDIT_SUBJ_SEN:
|
||||
case AUDIT_SUBJ_CLR:
|
||||
rc = mls_from_string(rulestr, &tmprule->au_ctxt, GFP_ATOMIC);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1948,7 +1948,7 @@ int selinux_audit_rule_match(u32 ctxid, u32 field, u32 op,
|
||||
/* a field/op pair that is not caught here will simply fall through
|
||||
without a match */
|
||||
switch (field) {
|
||||
case AUDIT_SE_USER:
|
||||
case AUDIT_SUBJ_USER:
|
||||
switch (op) {
|
||||
case AUDIT_EQUAL:
|
||||
match = (ctxt->user == rule->au_ctxt.user);
|
||||
@@ -1958,7 +1958,7 @@ int selinux_audit_rule_match(u32 ctxid, u32 field, u32 op,
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case AUDIT_SE_ROLE:
|
||||
case AUDIT_SUBJ_ROLE:
|
||||
switch (op) {
|
||||
case AUDIT_EQUAL:
|
||||
match = (ctxt->role == rule->au_ctxt.role);
|
||||
@@ -1968,7 +1968,7 @@ int selinux_audit_rule_match(u32 ctxid, u32 field, u32 op,
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case AUDIT_SE_TYPE:
|
||||
case AUDIT_SUBJ_TYPE:
|
||||
switch (op) {
|
||||
case AUDIT_EQUAL:
|
||||
match = (ctxt->type == rule->au_ctxt.type);
|
||||
@@ -1978,9 +1978,9 @@ int selinux_audit_rule_match(u32 ctxid, u32 field, u32 op,
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case AUDIT_SE_SEN:
|
||||
case AUDIT_SE_CLR:
|
||||
level = (field == AUDIT_SE_SEN ?
|
||||
case AUDIT_SUBJ_SEN:
|
||||
case AUDIT_SUBJ_CLR:
|
||||
level = (field == AUDIT_SUBJ_SEN ?
|
||||
&ctxt->range.level[0] : &ctxt->range.level[1]);
|
||||
switch (op) {
|
||||
case AUDIT_EQUAL:
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user