signal: Document the RCU protection of ->sighand
__cleanup_sighand() frees sighand without RCU grace period. This is correct but this looks "obviously buggy" and constantly confuses the readers, add the comments to explain how this works. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:

committed by
Paul E. McKenney

parent
eca1a08986
commit
392809b258
@@ -1022,11 +1022,14 @@ void __cleanup_sighand(struct sighand_struct *sighand)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&sighand->count)) {
|
||||
signalfd_cleanup(sighand);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* sighand_cachep is SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU so we can free it
|
||||
* without an RCU grace period, see __lock_task_sighand().
|
||||
*/
|
||||
kmem_cache_free(sighand_cachep, sighand);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Initialize POSIX timer handling for a thread group.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user