KVM: arm/arm64: Properly protect VGIC locks from IRQs

As Jan reported [1], lockdep complains about the VGIC not being bullet
proof. This seems to be due to two issues:
- When commit 006df0f349 ("KVM: arm/arm64: Support calling
  vgic_update_irq_pending from irq context") promoted irq_lock and
  ap_list_lock to _irqsave, we forgot two instances of irq_lock.
  lockdeps seems to pick those up.
- If a lock is _irqsave, any other locks we take inside them should be
  _irqsafe as well. So the lpi_list_lock needs to be promoted also.

This fixes both issues by simply making the remaining instances of those
locks _irqsave.
One irq_lock is addressed in a separate patch, to simplify backporting.

[1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2018-May/575718.html

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 006df0f349 ("KVM: arm/arm64: Support calling vgic_update_irq_pending from irq context")
Reported-by: Jan Glauber <jan.glauber@caviumnetworks.com>
Acked-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Andre Przywara
2018-05-11 15:20:12 +01:00
committed by Paolo Bonzini
parent 4c27625b7a
commit 388d435968
3 changed files with 23 additions and 14 deletions

View File

@@ -211,6 +211,7 @@ static int vgic_debug_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
struct vgic_state_iter *iter = (struct vgic_state_iter *)v;
struct vgic_irq *irq;
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = NULL;
unsigned long flags;
if (iter->dist_id == 0) {
print_dist_state(s, &kvm->arch.vgic);
@@ -227,9 +228,9 @@ static int vgic_debug_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
irq = &kvm->arch.vgic.spis[iter->intid - VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS];
}
spin_lock(&irq->irq_lock);
spin_lock_irqsave(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
print_irq_state(s, irq, vcpu);
spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
return 0;
}