xiaomi-sm8450/android_kernel_xiaomi_sm8450
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

x86/microcode/intel: Do not issue microcode updates messages on each CPU

Browse Source 
On large systems the microcode driver is very noisy, because it prints a
line for each CPU. The lines are redundant because usually all CPUs are
updated to the same microcode revision.

All other subsystems have been patched previously to not print a line
for each CPU. Only the microcode driver is left.

Only print an microcode revision update when something changed. This
results in typically only a single line being printed.

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: elliott@hpe.com
Cc: hmh@hmh.eng.br
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160609134141.5981-1-andi@firstfloor.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Andi Kleen
2016-06-09 06:41:41 -07:00
committed by Ingo Molnar
parent 9f3cc2a077
commit 354542d034
1 changed files with 17 additions and 7 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

18
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
View File

@@ -843,6 +843,7 @@ void reload_ucode_intel(void)
static int collect_cpu_info(int cpu_num, struct cpu_signature *csig) static int collect_cpu_info(int cpu_num, struct cpu_signature *csig)
{ {
static struct cpu_signature prev;
struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu_num); struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu_num);
unsigned int val[2]; unsigned int val[2];
@@ -857,8 +858,13 @@ static int collect_cpu_info(int cpu_num, struct cpu_signature *csig)
} }
csig->rev = c->microcode; csig->rev = c->microcode;
pr_info("CPU%d sig=0x%x, pf=0x%x, revision=0x%x\n",
cpu_num, csig->sig, csig->pf, csig->rev); /* No extra locking on prev, races are harmless. */
if (csig->sig != prev.sig || csig->pf != prev.pf || csig->rev != prev.rev) {
pr_info("sig=0x%x, pf=0x%x, revision=0x%x\n",
csig->sig, csig->pf, csig->rev);
prev = *csig;
}
return 0; return 0;
} }
@@ -887,6 +893,7 @@ static int apply_microcode_intel(int cpu)
struct ucode_cpu_info *uci; struct ucode_cpu_info *uci;
struct cpuinfo_x86 *c; struct cpuinfo_x86 *c;
unsigned int val[2]; unsigned int val[2];
static int prev_rev;
/* We should bind the task to the CPU */ /* We should bind the task to the CPU */
if (WARN_ON(raw_smp_processor_id() != cpu)) if (WARN_ON(raw_smp_processor_id() != cpu))
@@ -921,11 +928,14 @@ static int apply_microcode_intel(int cpu)
return -1; return -1;
} }
pr_info("CPU%d updated to revision 0x%x, date = %04x-%02x-%02x\n", if (val[1] != prev_rev) {
cpu, val[1], pr_info("updated to revision 0x%x, date = %04x-%02x-%02x\n",
val[1],
mc->hdr.date & 0xffff, mc->hdr.date & 0xffff,
mc->hdr.date >> 24, mc->hdr.date >> 24,
(mc->hdr.date >> 16) & 0xff); (mc->hdr.date >> 16) & 0xff);
prev_rev = val[1];
}
c = &cpu_data(cpu); c = &cpu_data(cpu);