btrfs: use explicit initializer for seq_elem
Using {} as initializer for struct seq_elem does not properly initialize the list_head member, but it currently works because it gets set through btrfs_get_tree_mod_seq if 'seq' is 0. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -3039,7 +3039,7 @@ out:
|
||||
static int check_ref(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root *root,
|
||||
u64 disko)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct seq_list tree_mod_seq_elem = {};
|
||||
struct seq_list tree_mod_seq_elem = SEQ_LIST_INIT(tree_mod_seq_elem);
|
||||
struct ulist *roots;
|
||||
struct ulist_iterator uiter;
|
||||
struct ulist_node *root_node = NULL;
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user