fs: Give dentry to inode_change_ok() instead of inode
inode_change_ok() will be resposible for clearing capabilities and IMA extended attributes and as such will need dentry. Give it as an argument to inode_change_ok() instead of an inode. Also rename inode_change_ok() to setattr_prepare() to better relect that it does also some modifications in addition to checks. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Šī revīzija ir iekļauta:
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static int utimes_common(struct path *path, struct timespec *times)
|
||||
newattrs.ia_valid |= ATTR_MTIME_SET;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Tell inode_change_ok(), that this is an explicit time
|
||||
* Tell setattr_prepare(), that this is an explicit time
|
||||
* update, even if neither ATTR_ATIME_SET nor ATTR_MTIME_SET
|
||||
* were used.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ static int utimes_common(struct path *path, struct timespec *times)
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If times is NULL (or both times are UTIME_NOW),
|
||||
* then we need to check permissions, because
|
||||
* inode_change_ok() won't do it.
|
||||
* setattr_prepare() won't do it.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
error = -EPERM;
|
||||
if (IS_IMMUTABLE(inode))
|
||||
|
Atsaukties uz šo jaunā problēmā
Block a user