net: add adj_list to save only neighbours
Currently, we distinguish neighbours (first-level linked devices) from non-neighbours by the neighbour bool in the netdev_adjacent. This could be quite time-consuming in case we would like to traverse *only* through neighbours - cause we'd have to traverse through all devices and check for this flag, and in a (quite common) scenario where we have lots of vlans on top of bridge, which is on top of a bond - the bonding would have to go through all those vlans to get its upper neighbour linked devices. This situation is really unpleasant, cause there are already a lot of cases when a device with slaves needs to go through them in hot path. To fix this, introduce a new upper/lower device lists structure - adj_list, which contains only the neighbours. It works always in pair with the all_adj_list structure (renamed from upper/lower_dev_list), i.e. both of them contain the same links, only that all_adj_list contains also non-neighbour device links. It's really a small change visible, currently, only for __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert/remove(), and doesn't change the main linked logic at all. Also, add some comments a fix a name collision in netdev_for_each_upper_dev_rcu() and rework the naming by the following rules: netdev_(all_)(upper|lower)_* If "all_" is present, then we work with the whole list of upper/lower devices, otherwise - only with direct neighbours. Uninline functions - to get better stack traces. CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> CC: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> CC: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> CC: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com> CC: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:

committed by
David S. Miller

parent
7863c054d1
commit
2f268f129c
@@ -1143,8 +1143,18 @@ struct net_device {
|
||||
struct list_head dev_list;
|
||||
struct list_head napi_list;
|
||||
struct list_head unreg_list;
|
||||
struct list_head upper_dev_list; /* List of upper devices */
|
||||
struct list_head lower_dev_list;
|
||||
|
||||
/* directly linked devices, like slaves for bonding */
|
||||
struct {
|
||||
struct list_head upper;
|
||||
struct list_head lower;
|
||||
} adj_list;
|
||||
|
||||
/* all linked devices, *including* neighbours */
|
||||
struct {
|
||||
struct list_head upper;
|
||||
struct list_head lower;
|
||||
} all_adj_list;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/* currently active device features */
|
||||
@@ -2813,15 +2823,15 @@ extern int bpf_jit_enable;
|
||||
extern bool netdev_has_upper_dev(struct net_device *dev,
|
||||
struct net_device *upper_dev);
|
||||
extern bool netdev_has_any_upper_dev(struct net_device *dev);
|
||||
extern struct net_device *netdev_upper_get_next_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
|
||||
struct list_head **iter);
|
||||
extern struct net_device *netdev_all_upper_get_next_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
|
||||
struct list_head **iter);
|
||||
|
||||
/* iterate through upper list, must be called under RCU read lock */
|
||||
#define netdev_for_each_upper_dev_rcu(dev, upper, iter) \
|
||||
for (iter = &(dev)->upper_dev_list, \
|
||||
upper = netdev_upper_get_next_dev_rcu(dev, &(iter)); \
|
||||
upper; \
|
||||
upper = netdev_upper_get_next_dev_rcu(dev, &(iter)))
|
||||
#define netdev_for_each_all_upper_dev_rcu(dev, updev, iter) \
|
||||
for (iter = &(dev)->all_adj_list.upper, \
|
||||
updev = netdev_all_upper_get_next_dev_rcu(dev, &(iter)); \
|
||||
updev; \
|
||||
updev = netdev_all_upper_get_next_dev_rcu(dev, &(iter)))
|
||||
|
||||
extern struct net_device *netdev_master_upper_dev_get(struct net_device *dev);
|
||||
extern struct net_device *netdev_master_upper_dev_get_rcu(struct net_device *dev);
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user