PM / OPP: Rename structures for clarity

Stephen pointed out recently, that few structures always confuse him as
they aren't named properly. And this patch tries to address that:

Names are updated as:
- device_opp or dev_opp -> opp_table
- dev_opp_list -> opp_tables
- dev_opp_list_lock -> opp_table_lock
- device_list_opp -> opp_device (it was never a list, but a structure)
- list_dev -> opp_dev
- And similar changes in comments and function names as well.

This also fixes checkpatch warnings that were generated with this patch.

No functional changes.

Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Viresh Kumar
2016-02-16 14:17:53 +05:30
committed by Rafael J. Wysocki
parent a5da64477e
commit 2c2709dc69
4 changed files with 461 additions and 459 deletions

View File

@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
* @table: Cpufreq table returned back to caller
*
* Generate a cpufreq table for a provided device- this assumes that the
* opp list is already initialized and ready for usage.
* opp table is already initialized and ready for usage.
*
* This function allocates required memory for the cpufreq table. It is
* expected that the caller does the required maintenance such as freeing
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
* WARNING: It is important for the callers to ensure refreshing their copy of
* the table if any of the mentioned functions have been invoked in the interim.
*
* Locking: The internal device_opp and opp structures are RCU protected.
* Locking: The internal opp_table and opp structures are RCU protected.
* Since we just use the regular accessor functions to access the internal data
* structures, we use RCU read lock inside this function. As a result, users of
* this function DONOT need to use explicit locks for invoking.
@@ -122,15 +122,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_free_cpufreq_table);
/* Required only for V1 bindings, as v2 can manage it from DT itself */
int dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus(struct device *cpu_dev, cpumask_var_t cpumask)
{
struct device_list_opp *list_dev;
struct device_opp *dev_opp;
struct opp_device *opp_dev;
struct opp_table *opp_table;
struct device *dev;
int cpu, ret = 0;
mutex_lock(&dev_opp_list_lock);
mutex_lock(&opp_table_lock);
dev_opp = _find_device_opp(cpu_dev);
if (IS_ERR(dev_opp)) {
opp_table = _find_opp_table(cpu_dev);
if (IS_ERR(opp_table)) {
ret = -EINVAL;
goto unlock;
}
@@ -146,15 +146,15 @@ int dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus(struct device *cpu_dev, cpumask_var_t cpumask)
continue;
}
list_dev = _add_list_dev(dev, dev_opp);
if (!list_dev) {
dev_err(dev, "%s: failed to add list-dev for cpu%d device\n",
opp_dev = _add_opp_dev(dev, opp_table);
if (!opp_dev) {
dev_err(dev, "%s: failed to add opp-dev for cpu%d device\n",
__func__, cpu);
continue;
}
}
unlock:
mutex_unlock(&dev_opp_list_lock);
mutex_unlock(&opp_table_lock);
return ret;
}