xfs: combine xfs_trans_ail_[remove|delete]()

Now that the functions and callers of
xfs_trans_ail_[remove|delete]() have been fixed up appropriately,
the only difference between the two is the shutdown behavior. There
are only a few callers of the _remove() variant, so make the
shutdown conditional on the parameter and combine the two functions.

Suggested-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Allison Collins <allison.henderson@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
This commit is contained in:
Brian Foster
2020-05-06 13:27:04 -07:00
committed by Darrick J. Wong
parent 6af0479d8b
commit 2b3cf09356
6 changed files with 6 additions and 43 deletions

View File

@@ -96,23 +96,6 @@ void xfs_ail_update_finish(struct xfs_ail *ailp, xfs_lsn_t old_lsn)
__releases(ailp->ail_lock);
void xfs_trans_ail_delete(struct xfs_log_item *lip, int shutdown_type);
static inline void
xfs_trans_ail_remove(
struct xfs_log_item *lip)
{
struct xfs_ail *ailp = lip->li_ailp;
xfs_lsn_t tail_lsn;
spin_lock(&ailp->ail_lock);
/* xfs_ail_update_finish() drops the AIL lock */
if (test_bit(XFS_LI_IN_AIL, &lip->li_flags)) {
tail_lsn = xfs_ail_delete_one(ailp, lip);
xfs_ail_update_finish(ailp, tail_lsn);
} else {
spin_unlock(&ailp->ail_lock);
}
}
void xfs_ail_push(struct xfs_ail *, xfs_lsn_t);
void xfs_ail_push_all(struct xfs_ail *);
void xfs_ail_push_all_sync(struct xfs_ail *);