[PATCH] m68k pt_regs fixes

m68k_handle_int() split in two functions: __m68k_handle_int() takes
pt_regs * and does set_irq_regs(); m68k_handle_int() doesn't get pt_regs
*.

Places where we used to call m68k_handle_int() recursively with the same
pt_regs have simply lost the second argument, the rest is switched to
__m68k_handle_int().

The rest of patch is just dropping pt_regs * where needed.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This commit is contained in:
Al Viro
2006-10-07 14:16:45 +01:00
committed by Linus Torvalds
parent 00079e04fe
commit 2850bc2737
44 changed files with 176 additions and 169 deletions

View File

@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
int psc_present;
volatile __u8 *psc;
irqreturn_t psc_irq(int, void *, struct pt_regs *);
irqreturn_t psc_irq(int, void *);
/*
* Debugging dump, used in various places to see what's going on.
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ void __init psc_register_interrupts(void)
* PSC interrupt handler. It's a lot like the VIA interrupt handler.
*/
irqreturn_t psc_irq(int irq, void *dev_id, struct pt_regs *regs)
irqreturn_t psc_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
{
int pIFR = pIFRbase + ((int) dev_id);
int pIER = pIERbase + ((int) dev_id);
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ irqreturn_t psc_irq(int irq, void *dev_id, struct pt_regs *regs)
for (i = 0, irq_bit = 1 ; i < 4 ; i++, irq_bit <<= 1) {
if (events & irq_bit) {
psc_write_byte(pIER, irq_bit);
m68k_handle_int(base_irq + i, regs);
m68k_handle_int(base_irq + i);
psc_write_byte(pIFR, irq_bit);
psc_write_byte(pIER, irq_bit | 0x80);
}