fs/adfs: mostly divorse inode number from indirect disc address
Avoid using the inode number as the indirect disc address, even though these currently have the same value. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ static int adfs_dir_read_inode(struct super_block *sb, struct inode *inode,
|
||||
{
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
ret = adfs_dir_read(sb, inode->i_ino, inode->i_size, dir);
|
||||
ret = adfs_dir_read(sb, ADFS_I(inode)->indaddr, inode->i_size, dir);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ static int adfs_dir_lookup_byname(struct inode *inode, const struct qstr *qstr,
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
obj->parent_id = inode->i_ino;
|
||||
obj->parent_id = ADFS_I(inode)->indaddr;
|
||||
|
||||
unlock_relse:
|
||||
up_read(&adfs_dir_rwsem);
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user