xiaomi-sm8450/android_kernel_xiaomi_sm8450
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

percpu: clean up percpu variable definitions

Browse Source 
Percpu variable definition is about to be updated such that all percpu
symbols including the static ones must be unique.  Update percpu
variable definitions accordingly.

* as,cfq: rename ioc_count uniquely

* cpufreq: rename cpu_dbs_info uniquely

* xen: move nesting_count out of xen_evtchn_do_upcall() and rename it

* mm: move ratelimits out of balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_nr() and
  rename it

* ipv4,6: rename cookie_scratch uniquely

* x86 perf_counter: rename prev_left to pmc_prev_left, irq_entry to
  pmc_irq_entry and nmi_entry to pmc_nmi_entry

* perf_counter: rename disable_count to perf_disable_count

* ftrace: rename test_event_disable to ftrace_test_event_disable

* kmemleak: rename test_pointer to kmemleak_test_pointer

* mce: rename next_interval to mce_next_interval

[ Impact: percpu usage cleanups, no duplicate static percpu var names ]

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xensource.com>
Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
This commit is contained in:
Tejun Heo
2009-06-24 15:13:48 +09:00
parent b9bf3121af
commit 245b2e70ea
13 changed files with 58 additions and 53 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
mm/kmemleak-test.c
View File

@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ struct test_node {
};
static LIST_HEAD(test_list);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(void *, test_pointer);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(void *, kmemleak_test_pointer);
/*
* Some very simple testing. This function needs to be extended for
@@ -86,9 +86,9 @@ static int __init kmemleak_test_init(void)
}
for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
per_cpu(test_pointer, i) = kmalloc(129, GFP_KERNEL);
per_cpu(kmemleak_test_pointer, i) = kmalloc(129, GFP_KERNEL);
pr_info("kmemleak: kmalloc(129) = %p\n",
per_cpu(test_pointer, i));
per_cpu(kmemleak_test_pointer, i));
}
return 0;