drm/i915: clear up wedged transitions

We have two important transitions of the wedged state in the current
code:

- 0 -> 1: This means a hang has been detected, and signals to everyone
  that they please get of any locks, so that the reset work item can
  do its job.

- 1 -> 0: The reset handler has completed.

Now the last transition mixes up two states: "Reset completed and
successful" and "Reset failed". To distinguish these two we do some
tricks with the reset completion, but I simply could not convince
myself that this doesn't race under odd circumstances.

Hence split this up, and add a new terminal state indicating that the
hw is gone for good.

Also add explicit #defines for both states, update comments.

v2: Split out the reset handling bugfix for the throttle ioctl.

v3: s/tmp/wedged/ sugested by Chris Wilson. Also fixup up a rebase
error which prevented this patch from actually compiling.

v4: To unify the wedged state with the reset counter, keep the
reset-in-progress state just as a flag. The terminally-wedged state is
now denoted with a big number.

v5: Add a comment to the reset_counter special values explaining that
WEDGED & RESET_IN_PROGRESS needs to be true for the code to be
correct.

v6: Fixup logic errors introduced with the wedged+reset_counter
unification. Since WEDGED implies reset-in-progress (in a way we're
terminally stuck in the dead-but-reset-not-completed state), we need
ensure that we check for this everywhere. The specific bug was in
wait_for_error, which would simply have timed out.

v7: Extract an inline i915_reset_in_progress helper to make the code
more readable. Also annote the reset-in-progress case with an
unlikely, to help the compiler optimize the fastpath. Do the same for
the terminally wedged case with i915_terminally_wedged.

Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This commit is contained in:
Daniel Vetter
2012-11-15 17:17:22 +01:00
parent 308887aad1
commit 1f83fee08d
5 changed files with 74 additions and 44 deletions

View File

@@ -89,36 +89,32 @@ static void i915_gem_info_remove_obj(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
static int
i915_gem_wait_for_error(struct i915_gpu_error *error)
{
struct completion *x = &error->completion;
unsigned long flags;
int ret;
if (!atomic_read(&error->wedged))
#define EXIT_COND (!i915_reset_in_progress(error))
if (EXIT_COND)
return 0;
/* GPU is already declared terminally dead, give up. */
if (i915_terminally_wedged(error))
return -EIO;
/*
* Only wait 10 seconds for the gpu reset to complete to avoid hanging
* userspace. If it takes that long something really bad is going on and
* we should simply try to bail out and fail as gracefully as possible.
*/
ret = wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(x, 10*HZ);
ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(error->reset_queue,
EXIT_COND,
10*HZ);
if (ret == 0) {
DRM_ERROR("Timed out waiting for the gpu reset to complete\n");
return -EIO;
} else if (ret < 0) {
return ret;
}
#undef EXIT_COND
if (atomic_read(&error->wedged)) {
/* GPU is hung, bump the completion count to account for
* the token we just consumed so that we never hit zero and
* end up waiting upon a subsequent completion event that
* will never happen.
*/
spin_lock_irqsave(&x->wait.lock, flags);
x->done++;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&x->wait.lock, flags);
}
return 0;
}
@@ -942,23 +938,14 @@ int
i915_gem_check_wedge(struct i915_gpu_error *error,
bool interruptible)
{
if (atomic_read(&error->wedged)) {
struct completion *x = &error->completion;
bool recovery_complete;
unsigned long flags;
/* Give the error handler a chance to run. */
spin_lock_irqsave(&x->wait.lock, flags);
recovery_complete = x->done > 0;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&x->wait.lock, flags);
if (i915_reset_in_progress(error)) {
/* Non-interruptible callers can't handle -EAGAIN, hence return
* -EIO unconditionally for these. */
if (!interruptible)
return -EIO;
/* Recovery complete, but still wedged means reset failure. */
if (recovery_complete)
/* Recovery complete, but the reset failed ... */
if (i915_terminally_wedged(error))
return -EIO;
return -EAGAIN;
@@ -1025,7 +1012,7 @@ static int __wait_seqno(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, u32 seqno,
#define EXIT_COND \
(i915_seqno_passed(ring->get_seqno(ring, false), seqno) || \
atomic_read(&dev_priv->gpu_error.wedged))
i915_reset_in_progress(&dev_priv->gpu_error))
do {
if (interruptible)
end = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(ring->irq_queue,
@@ -1379,7 +1366,7 @@ out:
/* If this -EIO is due to a gpu hang, give the reset code a
* chance to clean up the mess. Otherwise return the proper
* SIGBUS. */
if (!atomic_read(&dev_priv->gpu_error.wedged))
if (i915_terminally_wedged(&dev_priv->gpu_error))
return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
case -EAGAIN:
/* Give the error handler a chance to run and move the
@@ -3983,9 +3970,9 @@ i915_gem_entervt_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET))
return 0;
if (atomic_read(&dev_priv->gpu_error.wedged)) {
if (i915_reset_in_progress(&dev_priv->gpu_error)) {
DRM_ERROR("Reenabling wedged hardware, good luck\n");
atomic_set(&dev_priv->gpu_error.wedged, 0);
atomic_set(&dev_priv->gpu_error.reset_counter, 0);
}
mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
@@ -4069,7 +4056,7 @@ i915_gem_load(struct drm_device *dev)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev_priv->fence_regs[i].lru_list);
INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&dev_priv->mm.retire_work,
i915_gem_retire_work_handler);
init_completion(&dev_priv->gpu_error.completion);
init_waitqueue_head(&dev_priv->gpu_error.reset_queue);
/* On GEN3 we really need to make sure the ARB C3 LP bit is set */
if (IS_GEN3(dev)) {