btrfs: don't assume ordered sums to be 4 bytes

BTRFS has the implicit assumption that a checksum in btrfs_orderd_sums
is 4 bytes. While this is true for CRC32C, it is not for any other
checksum.

Change the data type to be a byte array and adjust loop index
calculation accordingly.

This includes moving the adjustment of 'index' by 'ins_size' in
btrfs_csum_file_blocks() before dividing 'ins_size' by the checksum
size, because before this patch the 'sums' member of 'struct
btrfs_ordered_sum' was 4 Bytes in size and afterwards it is only one
byte.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
Johannes Thumshirn
2019-05-22 10:19:01 +02:00
committed by David Sterba
parent 4bb3c2e2b5
commit 1e25a2e3ca
6 changed files with 34 additions and 24 deletions

View File

@@ -3199,7 +3199,8 @@ int btrfs_find_name_in_ext_backref(struct extent_buffer *leaf, int slot,
struct btrfs_dio_private;
int btrfs_del_csums(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 bytenr, u64 len);
blk_status_t btrfs_lookup_bio_sums(struct inode *inode, struct bio *bio, u32 *dst);
blk_status_t btrfs_lookup_bio_sums(struct inode *inode, struct bio *bio,
u8 *dst);
blk_status_t btrfs_lookup_bio_sums_dio(struct inode *inode, struct bio *bio,
u64 logical_offset);
int btrfs_insert_file_extent(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,