ACPICA: Standardize all switch() blocks

After many years, different formatting for switch() has crept in.
This change makes every switch block identical. Chao Guan.
ACPICA bugzilla 997.

References: https://bugs.acpica.org/show_bug.cgi?id=997
Signed-off-by: Chao Guan <chao.guan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

drivers/acpi/acpica/hwregs.c

@@ -419,6 +419,7 @@ acpi_status acpi_hw_register_read(u32 register_id, u32 *return_value)
 		break;
 
 	default:
+
 		ACPI_ERROR((AE_INFO, "Unknown Register ID: 0x%X", register_id));
 		status = AE_BAD_PARAMETER;
 		break;
@@ -491,7 +492,6 @@ acpi_status acpi_hw_register_write(u32 register_id, u32 value)
 		break;
 
 	case ACPI_REGISTER_PM1_CONTROL:	/* PM1 A/B: 16-bit access each */
-
 		/*
 		 * Perform a read first to preserve certain bits (per ACPI spec)
 		 * Note: This includes SCI_EN, we never want to change this bit
@@ -520,7 +520,6 @@ acpi_status acpi_hw_register_write(u32 register_id, u32 value)
 		break;
 
 	case ACPI_REGISTER_PM2_CONTROL:	/* 8-bit access */
-
 		/*
 		 * For control registers, all reserved bits must be preserved,
 		 * as per the ACPI spec.
@@ -555,6 +554,7 @@ acpi_status acpi_hw_register_write(u32 register_id, u32 value)
 		break;
 
 	default:
+
 		ACPI_ERROR((AE_INFO, "Unknown Register ID: 0x%X", register_id));
 		status = AE_BAD_PARAMETER;
 		break;