ACPICA: Standardize all switch() blocks

After many years, different formatting for switch() has crept in.
This change makes every switch block identical. Chao Guan.
ACPICA bugzilla 997.

References: https://bugs.acpica.org/show_bug.cgi?id=997
Signed-off-by: Chao Guan <chao.guan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Chao Guan
2013-06-08 00:58:14 +00:00
committed by Rafael J. Wysocki
parent b6872ff9a4
commit 1d1ea1b723
71 changed files with 242 additions and 77 deletions

View File

@@ -78,7 +78,6 @@ acpi_ds_exec_begin_control_op(struct acpi_walk_state *walk_state,
switch (op->common.aml_opcode) {
case AML_WHILE_OP:
/*
* If this is an additional iteration of a while loop, continue.
* There is no need to allocate a new control state.
@@ -99,7 +98,6 @@ acpi_ds_exec_begin_control_op(struct acpi_walk_state *walk_state,
/*lint -fallthrough */
case AML_IF_OP:
/*
* IF/WHILE: Create a new control state to manage these
* constructs. We need to manage these as a stack, in order
@@ -142,6 +140,7 @@ acpi_ds_exec_begin_control_op(struct acpi_walk_state *walk_state,
break;
default:
break;
}
@@ -344,6 +343,7 @@ acpi_ds_exec_end_control_op(struct acpi_walk_state * walk_state,
case AML_NOOP_OP:
/* Just do nothing! */
break;
case AML_BREAK_POINT_OP: