locking/rwsem: Rename 'activity' to 'count'

There are two definitions of struct rw_semaphore, one in linux/rwsem.h
and one in linux/rwsem-spinlock.h.

For some reason they have different names for the initial field. This
makes it impossible to use C99 named initialization for
__RWSEM_INITIALIZER() -- or we have to duplicate that entire thing
along with the structure definitions.

The simpler patch is renaming the rwsem-spinlock variant to match the
regular rwsem.

This allows us to switch to C99 named initialization.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-bmrZolsbGmautmzrerog27io@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
这个提交包含在:
Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-16 14:54:55 +02:00
提交者 Ingo Molnar
父节点 33ecd2083a
当前提交 13b9a962a2
修改 2 个文件,包含 18 行新增18 行删除

查看文件

@@ -15,13 +15,13 @@
#ifdef __KERNEL__
/*
* the rw-semaphore definition
* - if activity is 0 then there are no active readers or writers
* - if activity is +ve then that is the number of active readers
* - if activity is -1 then there is one active writer
* - if count is 0 then there are no active readers or writers
* - if count is +ve then that is the number of active readers
* - if count is -1 then there is one active writer
* - if wait_list is not empty, then there are processes waiting for the semaphore
*/
struct rw_semaphore {
__s32 activity;
__s32 count;
raw_spinlock_t wait_lock;
struct list_head wait_list;
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC