arm64: add on_accessible_stack()
Both unwind_frame() and dump_backtrace() try to check whether a stack address is sane to access, with very similar logic. Both will need updating in order to handle overflow stacks. Factor out this logic into a helper, so that we can avoid further duplication when we add overflow stacks. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Tested-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -193,8 +193,7 @@ void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk)
|
||||
if (in_entry_text(frame.pc)) {
|
||||
stack = frame.fp - offsetof(struct pt_regs, stackframe);
|
||||
|
||||
if (on_task_stack(tsk, stack) ||
|
||||
(tsk == current && !preemptible() && on_irq_stack(stack)))
|
||||
if (on_accessible_stack(tsk, stack))
|
||||
dump_mem("", "Exception stack", stack,
|
||||
stack + sizeof(struct pt_regs));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user