btrfs: extend balance filter limit to take minimum and maximum
The 'limit' filter is underdesigned, it should have been a range for [min,max], with some relaxed semantics when one of the bounds is missing. Besides that, using a full u64 for a single value is a waste of bytes. Let's fix both by extending the use of the u64 bytes for the [min,max] range. This can be done in a backward compatible way, the range will be interpreted only if the appropriate flag is set (BTRFS_BALANCE_ARGS_LIMIT_RANGE). Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
This commit is contained in:

committed by
Chris Mason

parent
2849a85422
commit
12907fc798
@@ -380,6 +380,7 @@ struct map_lookup {
|
||||
#define BTRFS_BALANCE_ARGS_DRANGE (1ULL << 3)
|
||||
#define BTRFS_BALANCE_ARGS_VRANGE (1ULL << 4)
|
||||
#define BTRFS_BALANCE_ARGS_LIMIT (1ULL << 5)
|
||||
#define BTRFS_BALANCE_ARGS_LIMIT_RANGE (1ULL << 6)
|
||||
|
||||
#define BTRFS_BALANCE_ARGS_MASK \
|
||||
(BTRFS_BALANCE_ARGS_PROFILES | \
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user