percpu_counter: Rename __percpu_counter_add to percpu_counter_add_batch

Currently, percpu_counter_add is a wrapper around __percpu_counter_add
which is preempt safe due to explicit calls to preempt_disable.  Given
how __ prefix is used in percpu related interfaces, the naming
unfortunately creates the false sense that __percpu_counter_add is
less safe than percpu_counter_add.  In terms of context-safety,
they're equivalent.  The only difference is that the __ version takes
a batch parameter.

Make this a bit more explicit by just renaming __percpu_counter_add to
percpu_counter_add_batch.

This patch doesn't cause any functional changes.

tj: Minor updates to patch description for clarity.  Cosmetic
    indentation updates.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Cc: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
Nikolay Borisov
2017-06-20 21:01:20 +03:00
committed by Tejun Heo
parent df95e795a7
commit 104b4e5139
11 changed files with 31 additions and 30 deletions

View File

@@ -1209,7 +1209,7 @@ xfs_mod_icount(
struct xfs_mount *mp,
int64_t delta)
{
__percpu_counter_add(&mp->m_icount, delta, XFS_ICOUNT_BATCH);
percpu_counter_add_batch(&mp->m_icount, delta, XFS_ICOUNT_BATCH);
if (__percpu_counter_compare(&mp->m_icount, 0, XFS_ICOUNT_BATCH) < 0) {
ASSERT(0);
percpu_counter_add(&mp->m_icount, -delta);
@@ -1288,7 +1288,7 @@ xfs_mod_fdblocks(
else
batch = XFS_FDBLOCKS_BATCH;
__percpu_counter_add(&mp->m_fdblocks, delta, batch);
percpu_counter_add_batch(&mp->m_fdblocks, delta, batch);
if (__percpu_counter_compare(&mp->m_fdblocks, mp->m_alloc_set_aside,
XFS_FDBLOCKS_BATCH) >= 0) {
/* we had space! */