KVM: s390: use defines for execution controls

Let's replace the bitmasks by defines. Reconstructed from code, comments
and commit messages.

Tried to keep the defines short and map them to feature names. In case
they don't completely map to features, keep them in the stye of ICTL
defines.

This effectively drops all "U" from the existing numbers. I think this
should be fine (as similarly done for e.g. ICTL defines).

I am not 100% sure about the ECA_MVPGI and ECA_PROTEXCI bits as they are
always used in pairs.

Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20170313104828.13362-1-david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
[some renames, add one missing place]
This commit is contained in:
David Hildenbrand
2017-03-13 11:48:28 +01:00
committed by Christian Borntraeger
szülő c0a6bfdc18
commit 0c9d86833d
6 fájl változott, egészen pontosan 56 új sor hozzáadva és 41 régi sor törölve

Fájl megtekintése

@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
typedef int (*intercept_handler_t)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
/* Transactional Memory Execution related macros */
#define IS_TE_ENABLED(vcpu) ((vcpu->arch.sie_block->ecb & 0x10))
#define IS_TE_ENABLED(vcpu) ((vcpu->arch.sie_block->ecb & ECB_TE))
#define TDB_FORMAT1 1
#define IS_ITDB_VALID(vcpu) ((*(char *)vcpu->arch.sie_block->itdba == TDB_FORMAT1))