Btrfs: use i_version instead of our own sequence

We've been keeping around the inode sequence number in hopes that somebody
would use it, but nobody uses it and people actually use i_version which
serves the same purpose, so use i_version where we used the incore inode's
sequence number and that way the sequence is updated properly across the
board, and not just in file write.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Josef Bacik
2012-04-05 15:03:02 -04:00
parent a25c75d5ad
commit 0c4d2d95d0
7 changed files with 19 additions and 10 deletions

View File

@@ -769,7 +769,7 @@ static int btrfs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb,
#ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_POSIX_ACL
sb->s_flags |= MS_POSIXACL;
#endif
sb->s_flags |= MS_I_VERSION;
err = open_ctree(sb, fs_devices, (char *)data);
if (err) {
printk("btrfs: open_ctree failed\n");