fuse: implement NFS-like readdirplus support
This patch implements readdirplus support in FUSE, similar to NFS. The payload returned in the readdirplus call contains 'fuse_entry_out' structure thereby providing all the necessary inputs for 'faking' a lookup() operation on the spot. If the dentry and inode already existed (for e.g. in a re-run of ls -l) then just the inode attributes timeout and dentry timeout are refreshed. With a simple client->network->server implementation of a FUSE based filesystem, the following performance observations were made: Test: Performing a filesystem crawl over 20,000 files with sh# time ls -lR /mnt Without readdirplus: Run 1: 18.1s Run 2: 16.0s Run 3: 16.2s With readdirplus: Run 1: 4.1s Run 2: 3.8s Run 3: 3.8s The performance improvement is significant as it avoided 20,000 upcalls calls (lookup). Cache consistency is no worse than what already is. Signed-off-by: Anand V. Avati <avati@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
This commit is contained in:

committed by
Miklos Szeredi

parent
ff7532ca2c
commit
0b05b18381
@@ -863,6 +863,8 @@ static void process_init_reply(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct fuse_req *req)
|
||||
fc->dont_mask = 1;
|
||||
if (arg->flags & FUSE_AUTO_INVAL_DATA)
|
||||
fc->auto_inval_data = 1;
|
||||
if (arg->flags & FUSE_DO_READDIRPLUS)
|
||||
fc->do_readdirplus = 1;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
ra_pages = fc->max_read / PAGE_CACHE_SIZE;
|
||||
fc->no_lock = 1;
|
||||
@@ -889,7 +891,8 @@ static void fuse_send_init(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct fuse_req *req)
|
||||
arg->flags |= FUSE_ASYNC_READ | FUSE_POSIX_LOCKS | FUSE_ATOMIC_O_TRUNC |
|
||||
FUSE_EXPORT_SUPPORT | FUSE_BIG_WRITES | FUSE_DONT_MASK |
|
||||
FUSE_SPLICE_WRITE | FUSE_SPLICE_MOVE | FUSE_SPLICE_READ |
|
||||
FUSE_FLOCK_LOCKS | FUSE_IOCTL_DIR | FUSE_AUTO_INVAL_DATA;
|
||||
FUSE_FLOCK_LOCKS | FUSE_IOCTL_DIR | FUSE_AUTO_INVAL_DATA |
|
||||
FUSE_DO_READDIRPLUS;
|
||||
req->in.h.opcode = FUSE_INIT;
|
||||
req->in.numargs = 1;
|
||||
req->in.args[0].size = sizeof(*arg);
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user