Bluetooth: Replace spin_lock by mutex in hci_dev

Now we run everything in HCI in process context, so it's a better idea use
mutex instead spin_lock. The macro remains hci_dev_lock() (and I got rid
of hci_dev_lock_bh()), of course.

Acked-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
This commit is contained in:
Gustavo F. Padovan
2011-06-17 13:03:21 -03:00
parent b78752cc71
commit 09fd0de5bd
9 changed files with 100 additions and 102 deletions

View File

@@ -188,11 +188,11 @@ static int hci_sock_blacklist_add(struct hci_dev *hdev, void __user *arg)
if (copy_from_user(&bdaddr, arg, sizeof(bdaddr)))
return -EFAULT;
hci_dev_lock_bh(hdev);
hci_dev_lock(hdev);
err = hci_blacklist_add(hdev, &bdaddr);
hci_dev_unlock_bh(hdev);
hci_dev_unlock(hdev);
return err;
}
@@ -205,11 +205,11 @@ static int hci_sock_blacklist_del(struct hci_dev *hdev, void __user *arg)
if (copy_from_user(&bdaddr, arg, sizeof(bdaddr)))
return -EFAULT;
hci_dev_lock_bh(hdev);
hci_dev_lock(hdev);
err = hci_blacklist_del(hdev, &bdaddr);
hci_dev_unlock_bh(hdev);
hci_dev_unlock(hdev);
return err;
}