btrfs: replace waitqueue_actvie with cond_wake_up
Use the wrappers and reduce the amount of low-level details about the waitqueue management. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1009,9 +1009,9 @@ void btrfs_dev_replace_clear_lock_blocking(
|
||||
ASSERT(atomic_read(&dev_replace->read_locks) > 0);
|
||||
ASSERT(atomic_read(&dev_replace->blocking_readers) > 0);
|
||||
read_lock(&dev_replace->lock);
|
||||
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&dev_replace->blocking_readers) &&
|
||||
waitqueue_active(&dev_replace->read_lock_wq))
|
||||
wake_up(&dev_replace->read_lock_wq);
|
||||
/* Barrier implied by atomic_dec_and_test */
|
||||
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&dev_replace->blocking_readers))
|
||||
cond_wake_up_nomb(&dev_replace->read_lock_wq);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void btrfs_bio_counter_inc_noblocked(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
|
||||
@@ -1022,9 +1022,7 @@ void btrfs_bio_counter_inc_noblocked(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
|
||||
void btrfs_bio_counter_sub(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, s64 amount)
|
||||
{
|
||||
percpu_counter_sub(&fs_info->bio_counter, amount);
|
||||
|
||||
if (waitqueue_active(&fs_info->replace_wait))
|
||||
wake_up(&fs_info->replace_wait);
|
||||
cond_wake_up_nomb(&fs_info->replace_wait);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void btrfs_bio_counter_inc_blocked(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user