security: mark expected switch fall-throughs and add a missing break
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. This patch fixes the following warnings: security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c:85:10: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:940:18: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:943:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:972:21: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:974:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] security/smack/smack_lsm.c:3391:9: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] security/apparmor/domain.c:569:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3 Also, add a missing break statement to fix the following warning: security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c:116:26: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] Acked-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> Acked-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Acked-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: James Morris <james.morris@microsoft.com>
This commit is contained in:

committed by
James Morris

parent
861f4bcffc
commit
09186e5034
@@ -3293,13 +3293,12 @@ static void smack_d_instantiate(struct dentry *opt_dentry, struct inode *inode)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
final = &smack_known_star;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Fall through.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* If a smack value has been set we want to use it,
|
||||
* but since tmpfs isn't giving us the opportunity
|
||||
* to set mount options simulate setting the
|
||||
* superblock default.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
/* Fall through */
|
||||
default:
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* This isn't an understood special case.
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user