Merge branch 'topic/mem-encrypt' into next
This branch has some cross-arch patches that are a prequisite for the SVM work. They're in a topic branch in case any of the other arch maintainers want to merge them to resolve conflicts.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -291,12 +291,6 @@ void dma_free_attrs(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_free_attrs);
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void dma_check_mask(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (sme_active() && (mask < (((u64)sme_get_me_mask() << 1) - 1)))
|
||||
dev_warn(dev, "SME is active, device will require DMA bounce buffers\n");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int dma_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
|
||||
{
|
||||
const struct dma_map_ops *ops = get_dma_ops(dev);
|
||||
@@ -327,7 +321,6 @@ int dma_set_mask(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
|
||||
return -EIO;
|
||||
|
||||
arch_dma_set_mask(dev, mask);
|
||||
dma_check_mask(dev, mask);
|
||||
*dev->dma_mask = mask;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -345,7 +338,6 @@ int dma_set_coherent_mask(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
|
||||
if (!dma_supported(dev, mask))
|
||||
return -EIO;
|
||||
|
||||
dma_check_mask(dev, mask);
|
||||
dev->coherent_dma_mask = mask;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@@ -461,8 +461,7 @@ phys_addr_t swiotlb_tbl_map_single(struct device *hwdev,
|
||||
panic("Can not allocate SWIOTLB buffer earlier and can't now provide you with the DMA bounce buffer");
|
||||
|
||||
if (mem_encrypt_active())
|
||||
pr_warn_once("%s is active and system is using DMA bounce buffers\n",
|
||||
sme_active() ? "SME" : "SEV");
|
||||
pr_warn_once("Memory encryption is active and system is using DMA bounce buffers\n");
|
||||
|
||||
mask = dma_get_seg_boundary(hwdev);
|
||||
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user