Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next

Alexei Starovoitov says:

====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2019-05-31

The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree.

Lots of exciting new features in the first PR of this developement cycle!
The main changes are:

1) misc verifier improvements, from Alexei.

2) bpftool can now convert btf to valid C, from Andrii.

3) verifier can insert explicit ZEXT insn when requested by 32-bit JITs.
   This feature greatly improves BPF speed on 32-bit architectures. From Jiong.

4) cgroups will now auto-detach bpf programs. This fixes issue of thousands
   bpf programs got stuck in dying cgroups. From Roman.

5) new bpf_send_signal() helper, from Yonghong.

6) cgroup inet skb programs can signal CN to the stack, from Lawrence.

7) miscellaneous cleanups, from many developers.
====================

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

include/uapi/linux/bpf.h

@@ -260,6 +260,24 @@ enum bpf_attach_type {
  */
 #define BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT	(1U << 1)
 
+/* BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32 is used in BPF_PROG_LOAD command for testing purpose.
+ * Verifier does sub-register def/use analysis and identifies instructions whose
+ * def only matters for low 32-bit, high 32-bit is never referenced later
+ * through implicit zero extension. Therefore verifier notifies JIT back-ends
+ * that it is safe to ignore clearing high 32-bit for these instructions. This
+ * saves some back-ends a lot of code-gen. However such optimization is not
+ * necessary on some arches, for example x86_64, arm64 etc, whose JIT back-ends
+ * hence hasn't used verifier's analysis result. But, we really want to have a
+ * way to be able to verify the correctness of the described optimization on
+ * x86_64 on which testsuites are frequently exercised.
+ *
+ * So, this flag is introduced. Once it is set, verifier will randomize high
+ * 32-bit for those instructions who has been identified as safe to ignore them.
+ * Then, if verifier is not doing correct analysis, such randomization will
+ * regress tests to expose bugs.
+ */
+#define BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32	(1U << 2)
+
 /* When BPF ldimm64's insn[0].src_reg != 0 then this can have
  * two extensions:
  *
@@ -2672,6 +2690,20 @@ union bpf_attr {
  *		0 on success.
  *
  *		**-ENOENT** if the bpf-local-storage cannot be found.
+ *
+ * int bpf_send_signal(u32 sig)
+ *	Description
+ *		Send signal *sig* to the current task.
+ *	Return
+ *		0 on success or successfully queued.
+ *
+ *		**-EBUSY** if work queue under nmi is full.
+ *
+ *		**-EINVAL** if *sig* is invalid.
+ *
+ *		**-EPERM** if no permission to send the *sig*.
+ *
+ *		**-EAGAIN** if bpf program can try again.
  */
 #define __BPF_FUNC_MAPPER(FN)		\
 	FN(unspec),			\
@@ -2782,7 +2814,8 @@ union bpf_attr {
 	FN(strtol),			\
 	FN(strtoul),			\
 	FN(sk_storage_get),		\
-	FN(sk_storage_delete),
+	FN(sk_storage_delete),		\
+	FN(send_signal),
 
 /* integer value in 'imm' field of BPF_CALL instruction selects which helper
  * function eBPF program intends to call