of: overlay: rename identifiers to more reflect what they do

This patch is aimed primarily at drivers/of/overlay.c, but those
changes also have a small impact in a few other files.

overlay.c is difficult to read and maintain.  Improve readability:
  - Rename functions, types and variables to better reflect what
    they do and to be consistent with names in other places,
    such as the device tree overlay FDT (flattened device tree),
    and make the algorithms more clear
  - Use the same names consistently throughout the file
  - Update comments for name changes
  - Fix incorrect comments

This patch is intended to not introduce any functional change.

Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Frank Rowand
2017-10-17 16:36:23 -07:00
committed by Rob Herring
parent bbed8794d5
commit 0290c4ca25
6 changed files with 310 additions and 271 deletions

View File

@@ -1230,7 +1230,7 @@ static void of_unittest_destroy_tracked_overlays(void)
if (!(overlay_id_bits[BIT_WORD(id)] & BIT_MASK(id)))
continue;
ret = of_overlay_destroy(id + overlay_first_id);
ret = of_overlay_remove(id + overlay_first_id);
if (ret == -ENODEV) {
pr_warn("%s: no overlay to destroy for #%d\n",
__func__, id + overlay_first_id);
@@ -1262,7 +1262,7 @@ static int of_unittest_apply_overlay(int overlay_nr, int unittest_nr,
goto out;
}
ret = of_overlay_create(np);
ret = of_overlay_apply(np);
if (ret < 0) {
unittest(0, "could not create overlay from \"%s\"\n",
overlay_path(overlay_nr));
@@ -1347,7 +1347,7 @@ static int of_unittest_apply_revert_overlay_check(int overlay_nr,
return -EINVAL;
}
ret = of_overlay_destroy(ov_id);
ret = of_overlay_remove(ov_id);
if (ret != 0) {
unittest(0, "overlay @\"%s\" failed to be destroyed @\"%s\"\n",
overlay_path(overlay_nr),
@@ -1476,7 +1476,7 @@ static void of_unittest_overlay_6(void)
return;
}
ret = of_overlay_create(np);
ret = of_overlay_apply(np);
if (ret < 0) {
unittest(0, "could not create overlay from \"%s\"\n",
overlay_path(overlay_nr + i));
@@ -1500,7 +1500,7 @@ static void of_unittest_overlay_6(void)
}
for (i = 1; i >= 0; i--) {
ret = of_overlay_destroy(ov_id[i]);
ret = of_overlay_remove(ov_id[i]);
if (ret != 0) {
unittest(0, "overlay @\"%s\" failed destroy @\"%s\"\n",
overlay_path(overlay_nr + i),
@@ -1546,7 +1546,7 @@ static void of_unittest_overlay_8(void)
return;
}
ret = of_overlay_create(np);
ret = of_overlay_apply(np);
if (ret < 0) {
unittest(0, "could not create overlay from \"%s\"\n",
overlay_path(overlay_nr + i));
@@ -1557,7 +1557,7 @@ static void of_unittest_overlay_8(void)
}
/* now try to remove first overlay (it should fail) */
ret = of_overlay_destroy(ov_id[0]);
ret = of_overlay_remove(ov_id[0]);
if (ret == 0) {
unittest(0, "overlay @\"%s\" was destroyed @\"%s\"\n",
overlay_path(overlay_nr + 0),
@@ -1568,7 +1568,7 @@ static void of_unittest_overlay_8(void)
/* removing them in order should work */
for (i = 1; i >= 0; i--) {
ret = of_overlay_destroy(ov_id[i]);
ret = of_overlay_remove(ov_id[i]);
if (ret != 0) {
unittest(0, "overlay @\"%s\" not destroyed @\"%s\"\n",
overlay_path(overlay_nr + i),
@@ -2149,9 +2149,9 @@ static int __init overlay_data_add(int onum)
goto out_free_np_overlay;
}
ret = of_overlay_create(info->np_overlay);
ret = of_overlay_apply(info->np_overlay);
if (ret < 0) {
pr_err("of_overlay_create() (ret=%d), %d\n", ret, onum);
pr_err("of_overlay_apply() (ret=%d), %d\n", ret, onum);
goto out_free_np_overlay;
} else {
info->overlay_id = ret;