reiserfs: strip trailing whitespace
This patch strips trailing whitespace from the reiserfs code. Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:

committed by
Linus Torvalds

parent
3cd6dbe6fe
commit
0222e6571c
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ key of the first directory entry in it.
|
||||
This function first calls search_by_key, then, if item whose first
|
||||
entry matches is not found it looks for the entry inside directory
|
||||
item found by search_by_key. Fills the path to the entry, and to the
|
||||
entry position in the item
|
||||
entry position in the item
|
||||
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -371,7 +371,7 @@ static struct dentry *reiserfs_lookup(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
|
||||
return d_splice_alias(inode, dentry);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
/*
|
||||
** looks up the dentry of the parent directory for child.
|
||||
** taken from ext2_get_parent
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ struct dentry *reiserfs_get_parent(struct dentry *child)
|
||||
return d_obtain_alias(inode);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* add entry to the directory (entry can be hidden).
|
||||
/* add entry to the directory (entry can be hidden).
|
||||
|
||||
insert definition of when hidden directories are used here -Hans
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -559,7 +559,7 @@ static int drop_new_inode(struct inode *inode)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* utility function that does setup for reiserfs_new_inode.
|
||||
/* utility function that does setup for reiserfs_new_inode.
|
||||
** DQUOT_INIT needs lots of credits so it's better to have it
|
||||
** outside of a transaction, so we had to pull some bits of
|
||||
** reiserfs_new_inode out into this func.
|
||||
@@ -820,7 +820,7 @@ static inline int reiserfs_empty_dir(struct inode *inode)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* we can cheat because an old format dir cannot have
|
||||
** EMPTY_DIR_SIZE, and a new format dir cannot have
|
||||
** EMPTY_DIR_SIZE_V1. So, if the inode is either size,
|
||||
** EMPTY_DIR_SIZE_V1. So, if the inode is either size,
|
||||
** regardless of disk format version, the directory is empty.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (inode->i_size != EMPTY_DIR_SIZE &&
|
||||
@@ -1162,7 +1162,7 @@ static int reiserfs_link(struct dentry *old_dentry, struct inode *dir,
|
||||
return retval;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// de contains information pointing to an entry which
|
||||
/* de contains information pointing to an entry which */
|
||||
static int de_still_valid(const char *name, int len,
|
||||
struct reiserfs_dir_entry *de)
|
||||
{
|
||||
@@ -1206,10 +1206,10 @@ static void set_ino_in_dir_entry(struct reiserfs_dir_entry *de,
|
||||
de->de_deh[de->de_entry_num].deh_objectid = key->k_objectid;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* process, that is going to call fix_nodes/do_balance must hold only
|
||||
* one path. If it holds 2 or more, it can get into endless waiting in
|
||||
* get_empty_nodes or its clones
|
||||
* get_empty_nodes or its clones
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int reiserfs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
|
||||
struct inode *new_dir, struct dentry *new_dentry)
|
||||
@@ -1263,7 +1263,7 @@ static int reiserfs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
|
||||
|
||||
old_inode_mode = old_inode->i_mode;
|
||||
if (S_ISDIR(old_inode_mode)) {
|
||||
// make sure, that directory being renamed has correct ".."
|
||||
// make sure, that directory being renamed has correct ".."
|
||||
// and that its new parent directory has not too many links
|
||||
// already
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1274,8 +1274,8 @@ static int reiserfs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* directory is renamed, its parent directory will be changed,
|
||||
** so find ".." entry
|
||||
/* directory is renamed, its parent directory will be changed,
|
||||
** so find ".." entry
|
||||
*/
|
||||
dot_dot_de.de_gen_number_bit_string = NULL;
|
||||
retval =
|
||||
@@ -1385,9 +1385,9 @@ static int reiserfs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
|
||||
this stuff, yes? Then, having
|
||||
gathered everything into RAM we
|
||||
should lock the buffers, yes? -Hans */
|
||||
/* probably. our rename needs to hold more
|
||||
** than one path at once. The seals would
|
||||
** have to be written to deal with multi-path
|
||||
/* probably. our rename needs to hold more
|
||||
** than one path at once. The seals would
|
||||
** have to be written to deal with multi-path
|
||||
** issues -chris
|
||||
*/
|
||||
/* sanity checking before doing the rename - avoid races many
|
||||
@@ -1465,7 +1465,7 @@ static int reiserfs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (S_ISDIR(old_inode_mode)) {
|
||||
// adjust ".." of renamed directory
|
||||
/* adjust ".." of renamed directory */
|
||||
set_ino_in_dir_entry(&dot_dot_de, INODE_PKEY(new_dir));
|
||||
journal_mark_dirty(&th, new_dir->i_sb, dot_dot_de.de_bh);
|
||||
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user