Merge tag 'modules-next-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rusty/linux

Pull module updates from Rusty Russell:
 "Main excitement here is Peter Zijlstra's lockless rbtree optimization
  to speed module address lookup.  He found some abusers of the module
  lock doing that too.

  A little bit of parameter work here too; including Dan Streetman's
  breaking up the big param mutex so writing a parameter can load
  another module (yeah, really).  Unfortunately that broke the usual
  suspects, !CONFIG_MODULES and !CONFIG_SYSFS, so those fixes were
  appended too"

* tag 'modules-next-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rusty/linux: (26 commits)
  modules: only use mod->param_lock if CONFIG_MODULES
  param: fix module param locks when !CONFIG_SYSFS.
  rcu: merge fix for Convert ACCESS_ONCE() to READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE()
  module: add per-module param_lock
  module: make perm const
  params: suppress unused variable error, warn once just in case code changes.
  modules: clarify CONFIG_MODULE_COMPRESS help, suggest 'N'.
  kernel/module.c: avoid ifdefs for sig_enforce declaration
  kernel/workqueue.c: remove ifdefs over wq_power_efficient
  kernel/params.c: export param_ops_bool_enable_only
  kernel/params.c: generalize bool_enable_only
  kernel/module.c: use generic module param operaters for sig_enforce
  kernel/params: constify struct kernel_param_ops uses
  sysfs: tightened sysfs permission checks
  module: Rework module_addr_{min,max}
  module: Use __module_address() for module_address_lookup()
  module: Make the mod_tree stuff conditional on PERF_EVENTS || TRACING
  module: Optimize __module_address() using a latched RB-tree
  rbtree: Implement generic latch_tree
  seqlock: Introduce raw_read_seqcount_latch()
  ...

include/linux/seqlock.h

@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
 #include <linux/spinlock.h>
 #include <linux/preempt.h>
 #include <linux/lockdep.h>
+#include <linux/compiler.h>
 #include <asm/processor.h>
 
 /*
@@ -274,9 +275,87 @@ static inline void raw_write_seqcount_barrier(seqcount_t *s)
 	s->sequence++;
 }
 
-/*
+static inline int raw_read_seqcount_latch(seqcount_t *s)
+{
+	return lockless_dereference(s->sequence);
+}
+
+/**
  * raw_write_seqcount_latch - redirect readers to even/odd copy
  * @s: pointer to seqcount_t
+ *
+ * The latch technique is a multiversion concurrency control method that allows
+ * queries during non-atomic modifications. If you can guarantee queries never
+ * interrupt the modification -- e.g. the concurrency is strictly between CPUs
+ * -- you most likely do not need this.
+ *
+ * Where the traditional RCU/lockless data structures rely on atomic
+ * modifications to ensure queries observe either the old or the new state the
+ * latch allows the same for non-atomic updates. The trade-off is doubling the
+ * cost of storage; we have to maintain two copies of the entire data
+ * structure.
+ *
+ * Very simply put: we first modify one copy and then the other. This ensures
+ * there is always one copy in a stable state, ready to give us an answer.
+ *
+ * The basic form is a data structure like:
+ *
+ * struct latch_struct {
+ *	seqcount_t		seq;
+ *	struct data_struct	data[2];
+ * };
+ *
+ * Where a modification, which is assumed to be externally serialized, does the
+ * following:
+ *
+ * void latch_modify(struct latch_struct *latch, ...)
+ * {
+ *	smp_wmb();	<- Ensure that the last data[1] update is visible
+ *	latch->seq++;
+ *	smp_wmb();	<- Ensure that the seqcount update is visible
+ *
+ *	modify(latch->data[0], ...);
+ *
+ *	smp_wmb();	<- Ensure that the data[0] update is visible
+ *	latch->seq++;
+ *	smp_wmb();	<- Ensure that the seqcount update is visible
+ *
+ *	modify(latch->data[1], ...);
+ * }
+ *
+ * The query will have a form like:
+ *
+ * struct entry *latch_query(struct latch_struct *latch, ...)
+ * {
+ *	struct entry *entry;
+ *	unsigned seq, idx;
+ *
+ *	do {
+ *		seq = lockless_dereference(latch->seq);
+ *
+ *		idx = seq & 0x01;
+ *		entry = data_query(latch->data[idx], ...);
+ *
+ *		smp_rmb();
+ *	} while (seq != latch->seq);
+ *
+ *	return entry;
+ * }
+ *
+ * So during the modification, queries are first redirected to data[1]. Then we
+ * modify data[0]. When that is complete, we redirect queries back to data[0]
+ * and we can modify data[1].
+ *
+ * NOTE: The non-requirement for atomic modifications does _NOT_ include
+ *       the publishing of new entries in the case where data is a dynamic
+ *       data structure.
+ *
+ *       An iteration might start in data[0] and get suspended long enough
+ *       to miss an entire modification sequence, once it resumes it might
+ *       observe the new entry.
+ *
+ * NOTE: When data is a dynamic data structure; one should use regular RCU
+ *       patterns to manage the lifetimes of the objects within.
  */
 static inline void raw_write_seqcount_latch(seqcount_t *s)
 {