123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254 |
- /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
- #ifndef LLIST_H
- #define LLIST_H
- /*
- * Lock-less NULL terminated single linked list
- *
- * Cases where locking is not needed:
- * If there are multiple producers and multiple consumers, llist_add can be
- * used in producers and llist_del_all can be used in consumers simultaneously
- * without locking. Also a single consumer can use llist_del_first while
- * multiple producers simultaneously use llist_add, without any locking.
- *
- * Cases where locking is needed:
- * If we have multiple consumers with llist_del_first used in one consumer, and
- * llist_del_first or llist_del_all used in other consumers, then a lock is
- * needed. This is because llist_del_first depends on list->first->next not
- * changing, but without lock protection, there's no way to be sure about that
- * if a preemption happens in the middle of the delete operation and on being
- * preempted back, the list->first is the same as before causing the cmpxchg in
- * llist_del_first to succeed. For example, while a llist_del_first operation
- * is in progress in one consumer, then a llist_del_first, llist_add,
- * llist_add (or llist_del_all, llist_add, llist_add) sequence in another
- * consumer may cause violations.
- *
- * This can be summarized as follows:
- *
- * | add | del_first | del_all
- * add | - | - | -
- * del_first | | L | L
- * del_all | | | -
- *
- * Where, a particular row's operation can happen concurrently with a column's
- * operation, with "-" being no lock needed, while "L" being lock is needed.
- *
- * The list entries deleted via llist_del_all can be traversed with
- * traversing function such as llist_for_each etc. But the list
- * entries can not be traversed safely before deleted from the list.
- * The order of deleted entries is from the newest to the oldest added
- * one. If you want to traverse from the oldest to the newest, you
- * must reverse the order by yourself before traversing.
- *
- * The basic atomic operation of this list is cmpxchg on long. On
- * architectures that don't have NMI-safe cmpxchg implementation, the
- * list can NOT be used in NMI handlers. So code that uses the list in
- * an NMI handler should depend on CONFIG_ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG.
- *
- * Copyright 2010,2011 Intel Corp.
- * Author: Huang Ying <[email protected]>
- */
- #include <linux/atomic.h>
- #include <linux/container_of.h>
- #include <linux/stddef.h>
- #include <linux/types.h>
- struct llist_head {
- struct llist_node *first;
- };
- struct llist_node {
- struct llist_node *next;
- };
- #define LLIST_HEAD_INIT(name) { NULL }
- #define LLIST_HEAD(name) struct llist_head name = LLIST_HEAD_INIT(name)
- /**
- * init_llist_head - initialize lock-less list head
- * @head: the head for your lock-less list
- */
- static inline void init_llist_head(struct llist_head *list)
- {
- list->first = NULL;
- }
- /**
- * llist_entry - get the struct of this entry
- * @ptr: the &struct llist_node pointer.
- * @type: the type of the struct this is embedded in.
- * @member: the name of the llist_node within the struct.
- */
- #define llist_entry(ptr, type, member) \
- container_of(ptr, type, member)
- /**
- * member_address_is_nonnull - check whether the member address is not NULL
- * @ptr: the object pointer (struct type * that contains the llist_node)
- * @member: the name of the llist_node within the struct.
- *
- * This macro is conceptually the same as
- * &ptr->member != NULL
- * but it works around the fact that compilers can decide that taking a member
- * address is never a NULL pointer.
- *
- * Real objects that start at a high address and have a member at NULL are
- * unlikely to exist, but such pointers may be returned e.g. by the
- * container_of() macro.
- */
- #define member_address_is_nonnull(ptr, member) \
- ((uintptr_t)(ptr) + offsetof(typeof(*(ptr)), member) != 0)
- /**
- * llist_for_each - iterate over some deleted entries of a lock-less list
- * @pos: the &struct llist_node to use as a loop cursor
- * @node: the first entry of deleted list entries
- *
- * In general, some entries of the lock-less list can be traversed
- * safely only after being deleted from list, so start with an entry
- * instead of list head.
- *
- * If being used on entries deleted from lock-less list directly, the
- * traverse order is from the newest to the oldest added entry. If
- * you want to traverse from the oldest to the newest, you must
- * reverse the order by yourself before traversing.
- */
- #define llist_for_each(pos, node) \
- for ((pos) = (node); pos; (pos) = (pos)->next)
- /**
- * llist_for_each_safe - iterate over some deleted entries of a lock-less list
- * safe against removal of list entry
- * @pos: the &struct llist_node to use as a loop cursor
- * @n: another &struct llist_node to use as temporary storage
- * @node: the first entry of deleted list entries
- *
- * In general, some entries of the lock-less list can be traversed
- * safely only after being deleted from list, so start with an entry
- * instead of list head.
- *
- * If being used on entries deleted from lock-less list directly, the
- * traverse order is from the newest to the oldest added entry. If
- * you want to traverse from the oldest to the newest, you must
- * reverse the order by yourself before traversing.
- */
- #define llist_for_each_safe(pos, n, node) \
- for ((pos) = (node); (pos) && ((n) = (pos)->next, true); (pos) = (n))
- /**
- * llist_for_each_entry - iterate over some deleted entries of lock-less list of given type
- * @pos: the type * to use as a loop cursor.
- * @node: the fist entry of deleted list entries.
- * @member: the name of the llist_node with the struct.
- *
- * In general, some entries of the lock-less list can be traversed
- * safely only after being removed from list, so start with an entry
- * instead of list head.
- *
- * If being used on entries deleted from lock-less list directly, the
- * traverse order is from the newest to the oldest added entry. If
- * you want to traverse from the oldest to the newest, you must
- * reverse the order by yourself before traversing.
- */
- #define llist_for_each_entry(pos, node, member) \
- for ((pos) = llist_entry((node), typeof(*(pos)), member); \
- member_address_is_nonnull(pos, member); \
- (pos) = llist_entry((pos)->member.next, typeof(*(pos)), member))
- /**
- * llist_for_each_entry_safe - iterate over some deleted entries of lock-less list of given type
- * safe against removal of list entry
- * @pos: the type * to use as a loop cursor.
- * @n: another type * to use as temporary storage
- * @node: the first entry of deleted list entries.
- * @member: the name of the llist_node with the struct.
- *
- * In general, some entries of the lock-less list can be traversed
- * safely only after being removed from list, so start with an entry
- * instead of list head.
- *
- * If being used on entries deleted from lock-less list directly, the
- * traverse order is from the newest to the oldest added entry. If
- * you want to traverse from the oldest to the newest, you must
- * reverse the order by yourself before traversing.
- */
- #define llist_for_each_entry_safe(pos, n, node, member) \
- for (pos = llist_entry((node), typeof(*pos), member); \
- member_address_is_nonnull(pos, member) && \
- (n = llist_entry(pos->member.next, typeof(*n), member), true); \
- pos = n)
- /**
- * llist_empty - tests whether a lock-less list is empty
- * @head: the list to test
- *
- * Not guaranteed to be accurate or up to date. Just a quick way to
- * test whether the list is empty without deleting something from the
- * list.
- */
- static inline bool llist_empty(const struct llist_head *head)
- {
- return READ_ONCE(head->first) == NULL;
- }
- static inline struct llist_node *llist_next(struct llist_node *node)
- {
- return node->next;
- }
- extern bool llist_add_batch(struct llist_node *new_first,
- struct llist_node *new_last,
- struct llist_head *head);
- static inline bool __llist_add_batch(struct llist_node *new_first,
- struct llist_node *new_last,
- struct llist_head *head)
- {
- new_last->next = head->first;
- head->first = new_first;
- return new_last->next == NULL;
- }
- /**
- * llist_add - add a new entry
- * @new: new entry to be added
- * @head: the head for your lock-less list
- *
- * Returns true if the list was empty prior to adding this entry.
- */
- static inline bool llist_add(struct llist_node *new, struct llist_head *head)
- {
- return llist_add_batch(new, new, head);
- }
- static inline bool __llist_add(struct llist_node *new, struct llist_head *head)
- {
- return __llist_add_batch(new, new, head);
- }
- /**
- * llist_del_all - delete all entries from lock-less list
- * @head: the head of lock-less list to delete all entries
- *
- * If list is empty, return NULL, otherwise, delete all entries and
- * return the pointer to the first entry. The order of entries
- * deleted is from the newest to the oldest added one.
- */
- static inline struct llist_node *llist_del_all(struct llist_head *head)
- {
- return xchg(&head->first, NULL);
- }
- static inline struct llist_node *__llist_del_all(struct llist_head *head)
- {
- struct llist_node *first = head->first;
- head->first = NULL;
- return first;
- }
- extern struct llist_node *llist_del_first(struct llist_head *head);
- struct llist_node *llist_reverse_order(struct llist_node *head);
- #endif /* LLIST_H */
|