123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222 |
- Assembler Annotations
- =====================
- Copyright (c) 2017-2019 Jiri Slaby
- This document describes the new macros for annotation of data and code in
- assembly. In particular, it contains information about ``SYM_FUNC_START``,
- ``SYM_FUNC_END``, ``SYM_CODE_START``, and similar.
- Rationale
- ---------
- Some code like entries, trampolines, or boot code needs to be written in
- assembly. The same as in C, such code is grouped into functions and
- accompanied with data. Standard assemblers do not force users into precisely
- marking these pieces as code, data, or even specifying their length.
- Nevertheless, assemblers provide developers with such annotations to aid
- debuggers throughout assembly. On top of that, developers also want to mark
- some functions as *global* in order to be visible outside of their translation
- units.
- Over time, the Linux kernel has adopted macros from various projects (like
- ``binutils``) to facilitate such annotations. So for historic reasons,
- developers have been using ``ENTRY``, ``END``, ``ENDPROC``, and other
- annotations in assembly. Due to the lack of their documentation, the macros
- are used in rather wrong contexts at some locations. Clearly, ``ENTRY`` was
- intended to denote the beginning of global symbols (be it data or code).
- ``END`` used to mark the end of data or end of special functions with
- *non-standard* calling convention. In contrast, ``ENDPROC`` should annotate
- only ends of *standard* functions.
- When these macros are used correctly, they help assemblers generate a nice
- object with both sizes and types set correctly. For example, the result of
- ``arch/x86/lib/putuser.S``::
- Num: Value Size Type Bind Vis Ndx Name
- 25: 0000000000000000 33 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 1 __put_user_1
- 29: 0000000000000030 37 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 1 __put_user_2
- 32: 0000000000000060 36 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 1 __put_user_4
- 35: 0000000000000090 37 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 1 __put_user_8
- This is not only important for debugging purposes. When there are properly
- annotated objects like this, tools can be run on them to generate more useful
- information. In particular, on properly annotated objects, ``objtool`` can be
- run to check and fix the object if needed. Currently, ``objtool`` can report
- missing frame pointer setup/destruction in functions. It can also
- automatically generate annotations for the ORC unwinder
- (Documentation/x86/orc-unwinder.rst)
- for most code. Both of these are especially important to support reliable
- stack traces which are in turn necessary for kernel live patching
- (Documentation/livepatch/livepatch.rst).
- Caveat and Discussion
- ---------------------
- As one might realize, there were only three macros previously. That is indeed
- insufficient to cover all the combinations of cases:
- * standard/non-standard function
- * code/data
- * global/local symbol
- There was a discussion_ and instead of extending the current ``ENTRY/END*``
- macros, it was decided that brand new macros should be introduced instead::
- So how about using macro names that actually show the purpose, instead
- of importing all the crappy, historic, essentially randomly chosen
- debug symbol macro names from the binutils and older kernels?
- .. _discussion: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
- Macros Description
- ------------------
- The new macros are prefixed with the ``SYM_`` prefix and can be divided into
- three main groups:
- 1. ``SYM_FUNC_*`` -- to annotate C-like functions. This means functions with
- standard C calling conventions. For example, on x86, this means that the
- stack contains a return address at the predefined place and a return from
- the function can happen in a standard way. When frame pointers are enabled,
- save/restore of frame pointer shall happen at the start/end of a function,
- respectively, too.
- Checking tools like ``objtool`` should ensure such marked functions conform
- to these rules. The tools can also easily annotate these functions with
- debugging information (like *ORC data*) automatically.
- 2. ``SYM_CODE_*`` -- special functions called with special stack. Be it
- interrupt handlers with special stack content, trampolines, or startup
- functions.
- Checking tools mostly ignore checking of these functions. But some debug
- information still can be generated automatically. For correct debug data,
- this code needs hints like ``UNWIND_HINT_REGS`` provided by developers.
- 3. ``SYM_DATA*`` -- obviously data belonging to ``.data`` sections and not to
- ``.text``. Data do not contain instructions, so they have to be treated
- specially by the tools: they should not treat the bytes as instructions,
- nor assign any debug information to them.
- Instruction Macros
- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- This section covers ``SYM_FUNC_*`` and ``SYM_CODE_*`` enumerated above.
- ``objtool`` requires that all code must be contained in an ELF symbol. Symbol
- names that have a ``.L`` prefix do not emit symbol table entries. ``.L``
- prefixed symbols can be used within a code region, but should be avoided for
- denoting a range of code via ``SYM_*_START/END`` annotations.
- * ``SYM_FUNC_START`` and ``SYM_FUNC_START_LOCAL`` are supposed to be **the
- most frequent markings**. They are used for functions with standard calling
- conventions -- global and local. Like in C, they both align the functions to
- architecture specific ``__ALIGN`` bytes. There are also ``_NOALIGN`` variants
- for special cases where developers do not want this implicit alignment.
- ``SYM_FUNC_START_WEAK`` and ``SYM_FUNC_START_WEAK_NOALIGN`` markings are
- also offered as an assembler counterpart to the *weak* attribute known from
- C.
- All of these **shall** be coupled with ``SYM_FUNC_END``. First, it marks
- the sequence of instructions as a function and computes its size to the
- generated object file. Second, it also eases checking and processing such
- object files as the tools can trivially find exact function boundaries.
- So in most cases, developers should write something like in the following
- example, having some asm instructions in between the macros, of course::
- SYM_FUNC_START(memset)
- ... asm insns ...
- SYM_FUNC_END(memset)
- In fact, this kind of annotation corresponds to the now deprecated ``ENTRY``
- and ``ENDPROC`` macros.
- * ``SYM_FUNC_ALIAS``, ``SYM_FUNC_ALIAS_LOCAL``, and ``SYM_FUNC_ALIAS_WEAK`` can
- be used to define multiple names for a function. The typical use is::
- SYM_FUNC_START(__memset)
- ... asm insns ...
- SYN_FUNC_END(__memset)
- SYM_FUNC_ALIAS(memset, __memset)
- In this example, one can call ``__memset`` or ``memset`` with the same
- result, except the debug information for the instructions is generated to
- the object file only once -- for the non-``ALIAS`` case.
- * ``SYM_CODE_START`` and ``SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL`` should be used only in
- special cases -- if you know what you are doing. This is used exclusively
- for interrupt handlers and similar where the calling convention is not the C
- one. ``_NOALIGN`` variants exist too. The use is the same as for the ``FUNC``
- category above::
- SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL(bad_put_user)
- ... asm insns ...
- SYM_CODE_END(bad_put_user)
- Again, every ``SYM_CODE_START*`` **shall** be coupled by ``SYM_CODE_END``.
- To some extent, this category corresponds to deprecated ``ENTRY`` and
- ``END``. Except ``END`` had several other meanings too.
- * ``SYM_INNER_LABEL*`` is used to denote a label inside some
- ``SYM_{CODE,FUNC}_START`` and ``SYM_{CODE,FUNC}_END``. They are very similar
- to C labels, except they can be made global. An example of use::
- SYM_CODE_START(ftrace_caller)
- /* save_mcount_regs fills in first two parameters */
- ...
- SYM_INNER_LABEL(ftrace_caller_op_ptr, SYM_L_GLOBAL)
- /* Load the ftrace_ops into the 3rd parameter */
- ...
- SYM_INNER_LABEL(ftrace_call, SYM_L_GLOBAL)
- call ftrace_stub
- ...
- retq
- SYM_CODE_END(ftrace_caller)
- Data Macros
- ~~~~~~~~~~~
- Similar to instructions, there is a couple of macros to describe data in the
- assembly.
- * ``SYM_DATA_START`` and ``SYM_DATA_START_LOCAL`` mark the start of some data
- and shall be used in conjunction with either ``SYM_DATA_END``, or
- ``SYM_DATA_END_LABEL``. The latter adds also a label to the end, so that
- people can use ``lstack`` and (local) ``lstack_end`` in the following
- example::
- SYM_DATA_START_LOCAL(lstack)
- .skip 4096
- SYM_DATA_END_LABEL(lstack, SYM_L_LOCAL, lstack_end)
- * ``SYM_DATA`` and ``SYM_DATA_LOCAL`` are variants for simple, mostly one-line
- data::
- SYM_DATA(HEAP, .long rm_heap)
- SYM_DATA(heap_end, .long rm_stack)
- In the end, they expand to ``SYM_DATA_START`` with ``SYM_DATA_END``
- internally.
- Support Macros
- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- All the above reduce themselves to some invocation of ``SYM_START``,
- ``SYM_END``, or ``SYM_ENTRY`` at last. Normally, developers should avoid using
- these.
- Further, in the above examples, one could see ``SYM_L_LOCAL``. There are also
- ``SYM_L_GLOBAL`` and ``SYM_L_WEAK``. All are intended to denote linkage of a
- symbol marked by them. They are used either in ``_LABEL`` variants of the
- earlier macros, or in ``SYM_START``.
- Overriding Macros
- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- Architecture can also override any of the macros in their own
- ``asm/linkage.h``, including macros specifying the type of a symbol
- (``SYM_T_FUNC``, ``SYM_T_OBJECT``, and ``SYM_T_NONE``). As every macro
- described in this file is surrounded by ``#ifdef`` + ``#endif``, it is enough
- to define the macros differently in the aforementioned architecture-dependent
- header.
|